/*Accordion Page Settings*/

Compliance

206 Launching and Growing a 3rd Party IVF Program with Dr. Daniel Shapiro and Dr. Monica Best

DISCLAIMER: Today’s Advertiser helped make the production and delivery of this episode possible, for free, to you! But the themes expressed by the guests do not necessarily reflect the views of Inside Reproductive Health, nor of the Advertiser. The Advertiser does not have editorial control over the content of this episode, and the guest’s appearance is not an endorsement of the Advertiser.


What does it take to grow a third party IVF Program?

Dr. Daniel Shapiro and Dr. Monica Best from RBA Atlanta provide exclusive insights into the intricacies involved in establishing and developing a third-party IVF Program.

Tune in to learn:

  • The essentials to staying compliant with the FDA

  • How to properly counsel patients on 3rd party options: Dr. Best’s tips

  • What to tell donors during the application process (And what to tell them if they’re not selected)

  • Processes currently impeding more 3rd party IVF cases (But how new technologies are changing that)

  • Dr. Shapiro’s hard-won lessons from running an egg bank


Dr. Daniel Shapiro
LinkedIn

Dr. Monica Best
Reproductive Endocrinologist

Reproductive Biology Associates
Website
LinkedIn
Facebook
Instagram

Transcript

[00:00:00] Dr. David Shapiro: The barrier to egg donation is the supply of egg donors. If, if you build it, they will come, you know, there's between 18 and 25, 000 egg donation cycles a year in the U S and the demand is far greater than that. And so with the limiting factor right now is the availability of donors. And so anything we could do sociologically, technically, medically, financially, to make donation appealing to young women and safe, um, at the same time. Yeah, that would, that would grease the wheel on the egg donor side. 

[00:00:36] Sponsor: This episode was brought to you by Mind360. A leading fertility mental health platform. How long does it take your clinic to get patients through their third party psycho psychological evaluation?

Find out how your clinic compares with Mind360's free report at mind360.us/reducedwaittime. That's mind360.us/reducedwaittime

Announcer: Today's advertiser helped make the production and delivery of this episode possible for free to you. But the themes expressed by the guests do not necessarily reflect the views of Inside Reproductive Health, nor of the advertiser.

The advertiser does not have editorial control over the content of this episode, and the guest's appearance is not an endorsement of the advertiser.

[00:01:27] Griffin Jones: What does it take to grow your third party IVF program? What do you have to do to be compliant with the FDA? What qualities does your staff have to have? What do you need to say to the patient as they're being counseled on third party IVF options? What do you need to say to donors upon application? And what do you tell them if they're not selected?

And how? What are the process and technological impediments preventing more third party IVF cases from being done. And how is technology being used to remove those impediments? Technology that's on its way and brand new technology that's already being vetted and implemented by my guests. My guests are Drs.

Monica Best and Danny Shapiro. They're both practicing RAIs at Reproductive Biology Associates. who you know is RBA Atlanta. Dr. Shapiro is their medical director, and he's the clinical manager and co founder of an egg bank that you know pretty well. And we talk about the hard lessons learned from that and the mechanics behind building an egg bank of that size.

Dr. Best finished her fellowship in 2013, stayed in Atlanta, joined RBA. And for me, it was fun to interview Two physicians who worked together but started their careers roughly two decades apart. I found it insightful because it made it easier for me to figure out milestones, and I'd be interested to hear where you track on that timeline as well.

I hope you enjoy this topic on growing a third party IVF program with Dr. Monica Best and Dr. Daniel Shapiro, Dr. Best Monica, Dr. Shapiro Danny, welcome to both of you to the Inside Reproductive Health Podcast. 

[00:02:52] Dr. David Shapiro: Thanks for having us, Griffin. 

[00:02:53] Dr. Monica Best: Thank you, Griffin. It's wonderful to be here. 

[00:02:55] Griffin Jones: It's my pleasure. It's been a while since I've covered a topic on third party IVF.

I feel like I should be covering it more. Maybe it's just because I'm on a David Sable kick and Dr. Sable is just recognized in New York and he's constantly talking about the, Potential population for art services being much greater than what we're currently serving. And so I feel like, well, third party is a big piece of that.

Maybe that's part of the reason why I feel that we need to be digging into this a little bit deeper. And each of you are recognized for your expertise in third party IVF. But I'm not that familiar with with either of it. And so I would love for, uh, each of you just to share what your third party IVF practice interest in areas are and how you develop them, Monica.

[00:03:49] Dr. Monica Best: Well, I mean, I'm, I'm really interested in almost all facets of third party, you know, to include, you know, egg donation, surrogacy, you know, helping couples through their journey with, You know, really any facet of this process. You know, I enjoy in many ways like opening, you know, the eyes of my patients because oftentimes, you know, really most often they're not, you know, this isn't on their radar as something that they're going to need to build their families.

So, you know, I really enjoy all facets of, you know, this field of medicine, you know, and, and ushering couples through their journey to reach their goal of building their family, no matter how that looks. 

[00:04:35] Dr. David Shapiro: My interest in third party reproduction is not quite as ancient as I am, but it's, it's old. We've been doing egg donation at RBA since 1992.

I joined the practice in 95. Our lab director, Peter Nagy, brought vitrification here when it was

And I'm the physician founder of MyEggBank North America and its medical director and also the medical director currently of RBA and with Peter and our then office manager and our nurse manager, we put together the egg bank and Helped to change the way third party's done because we brought in frozen egg donation as a routine technology The other part of it that really fascinates me.

I love egg donation, by the way Very few of us love it to be honest with you. It's not something that most reis say. Oh god I can't wait to do egg donation But it really, it really grabbed me because it's the solution to a very common problem, which is diminished ovarian reserve. Now, some patients with diminished ovarian reserve are going to get pregnant on their own.

Some are going to get pregnant with IVF using their own eggs. Some actually need another form of third party, they actually need surrogacy, even though they might have diminished reserve, they also have a uterine problem. But egg donation solves the diminished ovarian reserve problem by bypassing it. For some people, that's appropriate.

For others, it's not. But for a great many, it is. And aside from that, egg donation is the only technology available for gay male couples that wish to have children. And, you know, with gay people in the family and they're thinking about family building, you know, there's, there's a personal angle to this too, where, you know, everyone should have the right to child.

rear if they are so motivated and third party reproduction makes that possible. And so I'm real enthusiastic about that because it expands the definition of parenthood. It expands the definition of childbearing and it gives us something really fascinating and rewarding to do. I want 

[00:06:35] Griffin Jones: to hear more about what led you to forming an egg bank now almost 20 years ago, but I'm curious, Monica, if you agree with Danny's assessment that very few REIs love egg donation.

[00:06:51] Dr. Monica Best: Yeah, I mean, I, I think, you know, it's, it's oftentimes a very difficult discussion you have to have with, with patients because of course everyone comes in, you know, at least, you know, aside from, you know, the, you know, the same sex male couple who understands very clearly that they need an egg donor and they need a surrogate.

I think most of our, you know, patients do come in anticipating. being able to get pregnant, you know, if, you know, especially even if they're using donor sperm, they're still expecting to be able to use their own eggs and carry the pregnancy. And so it's oftentimes a really difficult discussion to have.

But I think once you get beyond that and, you know, patients. understand the efficiency oftentimes of the process. You know, I think it can be very, very rewarding, you know, to help someone build their family in this way, because in many cases, they may not have otherwise been able to achieve their goal of becoming a parent, you know, just with the barriers that we may have had either with, like Danny said, diminished ovarian reserve or uterine factors that really, you know, you know, present a blockade for patients to be able to carry.

[00:08:07] Griffin Jones: Was that the reason you were thinking of Danny, the heaviness of the conversation, or was there other reasons that you think of the Ari Aiza? 

[00:08:14] Dr. David Shapiro: That's a big one. And Monica's absolutely spot on with that. It's a very uncomfortable conversation when you're talking to a woman in her thirties with severe diminished ovarian reserve.

And they really expect it to just be able to get pregnant and carry and have the baby shower and the whole thing. And it's, it's a dream blowing up. And and interdigitating oneself into that and not not implying that I'm deficited because I carry a white chromosome but it's it's a little harder actually I think for Especially us old guys to talk to younger women about this loss because we don't, we don't have that experience personally ourselves where, I mean, again, I'm not meaning to berate my kind, but younger women who are in childbearing age, I think have a better understanding personally what that's like.

But the reason I think REIs don't like it is because it's labor intensive. to recruit egg donors, to get egg donors through an ovarian cycle, to be compliant with the FDA, to make sure that every single box is checked and that there is not a thing missed, requires an awful lot of attention. and a staff with OCD.

Because you really just can't miss anything. And though the FDA regulations are really not that difficult to follow, you do have to know them. And special situations occur all the time, where we have to make an eligibility determination about whether an egg can be used or not. And that's, that's all part of the day to day management of an egg donor program, and especially with a frozen donor egg program, which is what we founded, um, not only do you have to be compliant, but you have to consider different state regulations about quarantine.

Like New York, you have a, there's a six month quarantine on gametes. Now, it hasn't really been applied to eggs the way it has been to sperm, but technically, they're supposed to be quarantined in six months if they're collected in New York. I don't think anybody's doing that. But, but if you follow the truest letter of New York regulation, yeah.

So we also have to have tissue licenses in some states where others we don't, because we're selling eggs literally. across state lines. So the, the management and the ability to follow and problem solve and take yourself away from the regular day to day of REI, which is busy enough to administer an egg banking operation.

That's a lot. And even if it's a small donor program, it's a lot. The, the nuts and bolts of it aren't that much different than regular IVF, but the regulation and the management is three to five times more labor intensive than regular IVF. And I think that's why a lot of REIs would rather not have anything to do with it just takes too much time. 

[00:11:08] Griffin Jones: I want to go through those boxes that need to be checked when we come back to talk about management and I'll, and I'll go to Monica when we do, but I don't want to lose the, the thought of you starting my, I guess that was in 2005, was it, is that when you said Yeah. 

[00:11:24] Dr. David Shapiro: Well, sort of, not exactly.

So one of the pharma companies brought a study to us in end of 2005, beginning of 2006, involving the new freezing technique. So vitrification is rapid freezing. You literally by hand plunge whatever you're freezing into a vat of liquid nitrogen and it It doesn't technically freeze for those who like P Chem.

If there's no phase shift, it's still in liquid phase, but it's so cold it can't flow. Vitrification literally means turn to glass. For people who know the physical chemistry, glass is a liquid. If you've ever looked at the windows of a 1750s Revolutionary Era house on the Concord Trail, you'll see that the windows have ripples in them.

And that's because the glass is flowing. It's a liquid and it's following the direction of gravity. It just takes 250 years for it to go an inch, but it's a liquid. The vitrification process, there's no crystal formation. So ice, as you may know, forms a crystal when it When it forms from water and it expands, which is unusual among freezing things and little knives is what those crystals are.

And they kill the egg or the embryo from the inside out. If you don't get the water out, vitrification allows ultra dehydration. And then rapid cooling to the temperature of liquid nitrogen. And the beauty of that is that when you take it out of the freezer and you rehydrate properly, you get back what you put in, where the older technique, the slow freeze technique was automated.

That's its one advantage, but you didn't get all the water out. And the water was replaced with antifreeze rather than just completely evacuated. And so that led to lower survival rates, worse pregnancy rates, very inefficient, relatively speaking. So when the pharma company brought the study to us as the then medical director of the practice, the nurse manager and I sat down and we over selected our best donors and great recipient candidates to see what this would look like.

And we took 10 donors, we split their eggs, we froze them first, and then we distributed those eggs to 20 recipients. And 15 of the 20 were pregnant on the first embryo transfer. And there were 5 who had frozen embryos from those frozen eggs, and this had never been done before. where frozen eggs were turned into frozen embryos and then made babies.

And we had two of those five. And we were sitting at a meeting after the first nine cases had been completed and there were seven pregnancies. And I looked at our lab director, who is still our lab director, Dr. Naj, Peter Naj, and I said, I think we just became an egg bank. Now, there was some resistance in that moment.

That was at the very end of 2006, beginning of 2007. There was some resistance because it was a newer technology and we didn't want to stick our necks out too far and then have our heads cut off because we made a mistake. But we had enough proof of concept that we were able to organize a bank relatively quickly.

And so I sat down with a handful of selected nurses. Some of the best nurses in the practice at the time. And we established criteria for donor selection. We established criteria for donor management. We established criteria for posting of eggs. We started our rudimentary website to make the eggs available to recipients who wanted to review the frozen donors.

And by the end of 2007, we'd done about 30, 40 cases. And then in 2008. We just went hog wild and we did a hundred and something, and then in 2009 we did like 180, and then in 2010 we did over 200, and then we went national in 2011 and we invited other practices to join us and we shared the technology. So that they could make eggs at the same time we were and then we developed a network of egg banks basically that share eggs Share the technology and we like embryos can be made in Seattle and shipped to Atlanta to for an Atlanta recipient eggs can be shipped from Las Vegas to Boston where they can make the embryos in Boston.

We can do PGT in some of these cases. And so we created a commerce really over, over biologicals that previously had not existed. And the end result.

[00:15:45] Griffin Jones: So you're among the first, you're, you're establishing this and I, and I want to hear more about that. And result. But as you, as you're training, Monica, as you're training in fellowship, as you're coming into the field, how much of this is established versus how, uh, versus how much of it was all already established or still needed to be established?

[00:16:05] Dr. Monica Best: Yeah. So I, I started at RBA my career in 2013. And so I am walking in to this very. Rich history and, you know, just the richness of something that, you know, I previously, you know, did not have a lot of access to in training, you know, at Emory, um, where I did my fellowship. So, you know, there was a very steep learning curve here.

for me, but I think, you know, I just was tickled by the fact that we had the availability of this resource so that I could help my patients. You know, I did not have very much exposure to this. Before I started at RBA and so, you know, as Danny was saying, you know, it was just starting to explode At the time when I started practicing and so, you know, I you know as they say, you know You stand on the heels of Giants and you don't even realize you are and it seems like you know, oh well Of course, we have, you know, egg donation.

Of course, we have this network. But, you know, it, it just, you know, I tell patients all the time, like, what a great day in age to be practicing because I have every resource at my disposal and I know that I can help you get there. It's just a matter of, are you open to all of the options? 

[00:17:34] Griffin Jones: And so was this, was your first job at RBA?

Was that your first job out of fellowship? Yes. So you're in fellowship, presumably like 2010 to 2013, somewhere around there. Yes. And during that time, are you learning about egg banks forming and how they work and, and gestational care agencies and how they work or are you just learning about the medicine but not necessarily how it all, how you actually get those gametes, how you get those gestational carriers?

[00:18:02] Dr. Monica Best: Right. I think I had very limited understanding of egg donation in an egg bank. When I started in 2013, of course, you know, I understood surrogacy and, and I understood, you know, things like sperm donation, you know, anonymous sperm donation in patients that I treated, but really knew very little about, you know, egg donation and just, you know, what a, what a game changer it could be for my patients.

in terms of the availability of it. So, definitely was eye opening when I started. 

[00:18:36] Griffin Jones: How is it, how important is it for doctors to know the mechanics of how an egg bank works, how a GC agency works, how, like, is, it, it, it, like, is it really important? Is it somewhat important or not very? 

[00:18:49] Dr. David Shapiro: Hard to answer my bias is that it's medium important.

Okay, the nuts and bolts. Nah, no one's got time for that and they don't need to but to just say, oh, it's an egg bank. I'm just going to send my patient there. It's better to understand. I think sort of the. the gestalt of, of how a donor winds up being a frozen egg donor. Some of the egg banks, they take donors and dedicate them just to egg freezing, which is mostly what we do in the frozen side.

Others will use eggs not claimed in a fresh cycle. As the leftovers so to speak as their egg bank eggs, they'll freeze the leftovers The one's not inseminated for the benefit of the original recipient when you do it that way when it's when the bias is toward freezing the leftovers for People to come and take what's on the you know, filings basement shelf, the pregnancy rates are lower.

When you dedicate donors specifically to a frozen program, you get pregnancy rates pretty darn close if not the same as the fresh transfers, even without the genetic testing of the embryos. So. Knowing what model the bank uses, I think the physician should know that because if they're sending their patient to egg bank X, they want to know that the frozen eggs available to that, to their recipient are going to be eggs that were dedicated to that.

Purpose, because that's going to give the highest yield, where they could send to egg bank Y and be getting the eggs that were the last state of the 27 that were collected, and the lab, through insensible means, assigned the first 19 to the fresh cycle or whatever. And the eggs that they didn't like quite as much, but wouldn't say that, actually are the ones that wind up frozen.

You know the negative selection bias when you split the eggs fresh and frozen on purpose Winds up deficiting the frozen I think in fact, I think there's some evidence to that And so we do that too here. We the leftover situation, but the the primary Goal is to find a donor who should be all froze, frozen, so that you get the best eggs from the cohort in the freezer.

[00:21:08] Sponsor: Why do intended parents, donors, and surrogates need a psychological evaluation? How long does it take your clinic to schedule, perform, and complete these evaluations? ASRM has made psychological evaluation the standard of care for third party fertility cycles. Identifying behavioral, emotional, and other mental health concerns that could impact fertility treatments is an important part of the overall assessment for individuals and couples seeking third party fertility treatment.

While many fertility clinics recognize the importance of completing these evaluations promptly and with high quality, few have the capacity to perform these assessments themselves. That's where Mind360 can help. Mind360 makes this process quick and easy. Their team lets your patients complete their evaluations online from the comfort of their own homes with quick and easy appointment setting, immediate availability, and the quality of care that comes with ASRM trained psychologists.

Don't delay your third party cycles. Mind360 has provided thousands of psychological evaluations and counseling sessions over the last five years, helping patients, egg banks, surrogacy agencies, IVF clinics, and more navigate this process with ease. Find out how your clinic's psychological evaluation process compares with clinics who refer patients to Mind360 by downloading their free report at mind360.us/reducedwaittime. That's mind360.us/reducedwaittime.

[00:22:42] Griffin Jones: Monica, you're coming in. This infrastructure is established and you said you're standing on the shoulders of giants, but giants don't, fig, aren't, don't, aren't able to figure everything out and none of us are over. Even giants. Just saying.

And, and, yeah, and, and, and you're never tall enough to have everything figured out. And so what did you have to still figure out when, as you started getting into practicing third party IVF? Monica. 

[00:23:10] Dr. Monica Best: Yeah. I mean, I think, you know, just the logistics, like Danny alluded to earlier, you know, just the attention to detail and, you know, helping patients to sort of understand why we do what we do, that things have to be done a certain way, and we have to be compliant with the FDA.

I think one of the things I do is kind of walk patients through, you know, this is, you know, the process by which we select our egg donors, I think is important for every physician to understand so that they can relay that information to the patient just because that is important for them to know. But, you know, you know, they're, they're even, even if, you know, again, we're the most well oiled machine around, still as a clinician, I was, you know, having to You know, interface with the nurses who were expert in the FDA and understanding almost always there's an exception.

Almost always there's a special situation that comes up or tends to come up at RBA just because the complexity of our patients. And so, you know, having to go back, even though there are well defined guidelines of what the FDA requires, okay, well now we have this exception or now we have this complexity, you know, how do we either.

You know, you know, do something to make it compliant, or is this a case or, you know, a scenario that we can't accept moving forward? And there unfortunately have been those cases. 

[00:24:42] Dr. David Shapiro: Third party is as much getting all of the pieces of the puzzle organized properly as it is the science, the reproductive science.

[00:24:52] Griffin Jones: Let's talk about a couple of those. Those puzzle pieces for each of you to walk us through it. You said, you know, everything has to be all the boxes have to be checked. What are those boxes going going as chronologically as you can? 

[00:25:09] Dr. David Shapiro: Well, all right. So if you're, if your goal is safety for the donor, respect for the donor recognition for the donor's autonomy, and at the same time getting good eggs so that you get the pregnancies at the expected rate, you should limit it.

The age 21 to 31 should not take donors over 31 years of age. They should be able to fill out the questionnaire that we developed without triggering any of the hard stop questions that get them excluded. And they don't know which ones those are. They need to, we used to require that people be free of genetic carrier states.

But with 550 plus diseases on the panel, everybody carries something. So now we, we make sure there's no infortuitous match, but we do allow donors to carry pretty much everything except for X linked and obviously dominant diseases. The, the exclusions are numerous and you have to know what they are. I mean, they're, you can't even have a relative.

One relative who had heart disease before 50. One first degree relative, you're excluded. You can't have two relatives with diabetes. You're excluded, right? You can't be on psychotropic medication at the time of your donation. You're excluded. And the donors don't know this. And when they're filling out these questionnaires and we're vetting them, this is what we're looking for.

What are the exclusions? What are the exclusions? If they get through the questionnaire, then we assess their genetics by blood testing and genetic counseling. Then they go for basal antral follicle count and anti mullerian hormone level to make sure they're going to make enough eggs. Because if they're not going to make enough eggs, it isn't worth their time and it isn't worth it to us, quite honestly.

And so we, we bias heavily in terms of excessive ovarian response, which we can do safely now, which is one of the other big innovations in reproductive medicine in the last 10 years is the ability to get tons of eggs without hyperstimulating the patient. That's really what makes egg banking possible.

Something called agonist trigger, which replaced the old technique, which was called HCG trigger, which caused hyperstimulation and hospitalized donors all the time. It was a fraught technology, but with agonist trigger and a little bit of moderation, you can do this safely. The average egg yields within the egg banking.

practices that we're contracted with is 26 per retrieval, which is a very high number, right? But if each egg lot is six eggs, you get four egg lots out of every retrieval, which is the goal, right? And so we can do that safely. So we screen for very high ovarian response. We then have them come in for infectious disease testing because the FDA requires it.

They also, the timing of the testing is critical too. You have to get the egg donor, has to have her FDA infectious panel done within 30 days of the egg collection, otherwise the eggs are invalid, can't use them, right? So we typically draw the blood when they start their cycles, because that way we'll have it within 30 days.

But they also have to go through psych testing before they even begin a cycle. And they either do something called a personality assessment inventory or an MMPI 2, Minnesota Multiphase of Personality Inventory. We require that our egg banking network requires that PhDs administer the test because they're the only ones with enough training to actually score the tests themselves.

So that's the, the MyEggBank standard, which is the name of our egg banking operation. We use the PhD standard because. We think it should be the standard of care. The idea that you can test somebody to make sure they're psychologically stable and then send out the test to someone who has not interacted with the donor and have the test scored and be valid?

Too much risk. We won't do it. So we, we, it has to be a PhD level to screen our donors. Otherwise, no. We won't accept the screening. If they've been screened elsewhere and it was not by a PhD, we make them redo it. Once that's all done, the infectious disease testing, the full exam, the full interview, the psych, the ovarian reserve screening, the genetic screening, and of course the questionnaire, then they can go through ovarian stimulation.

And then there's a, a kind of a rote thing that I've noticed this just because I'm an old guy. The younger generation that's training now, they've learned ovarian stimulation kind of on, you know, like Betty Crocker, like Betty Crocker recipes. My generation was the first generation to benefit from the founder generation.

Working all of this out, but part of my training was I had to learn the basic physiology of each one of these drugs and why you pick one over the other. What we've, what we've learned in the last, well now 15 years of regular egg banking is that not every donor should be stimulated the same way. That there are combinations of drugs that are more favorable in some situations and less favorable in others.

And you have to be flexible in how you write the stimulations. There's a concept in reproductive medicine right now that everyone has to be on something called a combination protocol. It actually goes against the science. And the people in my generation were trained on that difference. My generation knows there's a difference between what's called an FSH only protocol and the combination protocol.

Now certainly there's a role for combination protocols, there's a big role for them, but it's not 85 percent of the protocol. It shouldn't be. The, the more basic protocol, the FSH only version actually is preferable in most cases. But that's not what people are taught now, even though the science says that that's true.

So part of the management of all of this is understanding what pieces you can manipulate to get the optimal outcome. So somebody with a lot of experience in ovarian stimulation or somebody who can teach others about ovarian stimulation, that's a critical component to this too. 

[00:31:05] Griffin Jones: So you're talking about change and innovation, which is a theme that I want to dig into a little bit more, because I Have this feeling that if you were to just sum up just if someone from outside of the field that knew nothing about art had to just kind of listen to people's feedback and then summarize in a sentence or two the level of change that's happened in the field that From all of the voices, they would surmise that nothing has changed and everything has changed.

And I suspect that there might be some of that flavor in third party as well. So before we go all the way back to 2013. What has changed in third party IVF since you've been practicing, Monica? 

[00:31:50] Dr. Monica Best: Oh gosh, you know, I mean, I just, I think the just sheer availability of eggs from multiple egg banks and just having to sort of manage that with patient expectation, you know, just coming from, you know, the perspective of RBA and our egg bank.

And, you know, having some level of control of the information about donors and understanding kind of the efficiency of our program and then having to sort of manage patient care with respect to them, you know, acquiring eggs from other egg banks, you know, just, you know, having to kind of, you know, deal with those differences I think is, has been something that's changed for me because.

You know, when I first started, I mean, it was, it was our egg bank. I mean, that's, you know, we were the largest egg bank in the country, the first egg bank in the country. Again, there's a lot of control and there's a lot of management of efficiency there. So I think that's one thing that's, that's, that's sort of changed.

And I also think, you know, patients. understand more about egg donation than they did when I first started. So I think that's helpful in counseling patients. 

[00:33:06] Griffin Jones: What makes you say that Monica, what kinds of questions are they asking you now that maybe they weren't 10 years ago? 

[00:33:12] Dr. Monica Best: You know, I mean, I, I think, you know, they're, they're asking about the availability of you know, of the resource.

You know, I don't necessarily have to, you know, counsel each patient that, you know, that egg donation is their most efficient path. Many of them come in understanding that or understanding that they need surrogacy. And so that, that does make the conversation easier. That does kind of help with efficiency of getting them.

from point A to point B. So those things have changed, I think, in the sense that, you know, we, we do have more resources, but in some ways it does make it more difficult because it's just, I mean, it's hard to find the same efficiency with other egg banks and other kind of, you know, third party entities that we have.

[00:34:01] Dr. David Shapiro: I, I think, I think there's also been a cultural shift among physicians on this. When I started here, without naming any names, there were physicians in our group who were flatly opposed to taking care of same sex couples, men or women, wouldn't. And that's going to be the bulk of third party in years to come.

And now it's every day. Everyday. And what, you know, might have raised the eyebrows of a baby boomer 25 years ago makes a Gen Y, Gen X, or millennia, or millennial, whatever you call them, go, yeah, and, I understand, right? This is what you do. Why are you even hesitating? Right? So there's that shift. Patients have come to expect also that this is something that they can access easily because they see famous people using egg donors and surrogates.

So it's out in the common, it's out in common parlance. People talk about this like it's nothing. Janet Jackson having a baby at 50. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out how that happened. Right. Or Gina Davis at 48 to figure out how that happened. 

[00:35:17] Griffin Jones: But do you have a lot of not rocket scientists coming in because they, they have not figured it out?

Because I hear that from doctors as well, that people have an inflated expectation of what they can do with, you know, just their own eggs. 

[00:35:31] Dr. David Shapiro: Because when the desperate housewife, I forget her name, the redhead, she went. She had twins with egg donation. She was very public about it when it happened. She said, this is egg donor.

Don't be ridiculous. I was 44. That's what she said. And that I remember when that happened, because I remember the patients and the reaction in the months that followed that revelation after her twins were born, people were like, it's all egg donor, isn't it? Like, so, I mean, all of these. Trade mags and the globe and, and national inquire with babies at 52.

I mean, it's not like donor, right? Like, like, yeah, we, we watched the interview with what's your name? And yeah. Yeah, we get it now. Now that hadn't happened in a while, but yeah. But they hear it. They know. More and more. 

[00:36:24] Dr. Monica Best: Patient expectations, I think, is helpful, right? Um, you know, those difficult conversations we were talking about before sometimes aren't as difficult when patients You know, when their expectations are, hey, I'm 44.

I know what I need. Or, you know, just like Danny was saying, you know, I think the ability to be able to treat same sex couples is extremely rewarding. You know, they, they come in, they understand what they need. And again, we have the resources to get them there. So, I mean, that's, that has shifted and grown and morphed really since I started practicing in 2013.

[00:37:04] Griffin Jones: Are there instances where expectations go the other way? So there's, there's a higher education on the part of patients, but does that ever put them in a place where they know enough to be dangerous now? 

[00:37:19] Dr. David Shapiro: You want to take that one? 

[00:37:22] Dr. Monica Best: Absolutely. You know, I think I, you know, I spend an inordinate amount of time you know, trying to manage expectations.

I think even under the best circumstances, there's still a failure rate of 30 to 40 percent. You know, embryos don't implant 30 to 40 percent of the time. Miscarriages still occur, even if we know we're dealing with genetically normal embryos, this gold standard. So I think, you know, yes. Yes, there are sometimes unrealistic expectations.

And some of these are emotional, right? You know, you're, you're spending all of this time and, you know, your, your resources in terms of, you know, your finances, your physical resources, everything. And you expect that after you You know, invest all of that, that you're going to be pregnant and, and I think sometimes those are, those are the difficult places to be.

[00:38:15] Griffin Jones: So , you started talking about the, the different requirements for donors from, it has to be done by a PhD, the, the hard stop questions, the exclusions, what were some of the hard lessons that you learned in the last, whatever it is, 16, 17 years regarding those? 

[00:38:39] Dr. David Shapiro: Some, some of the donor candidates with good reason.

I mean, I understand this. They take it personally when they're, when they're excluded. Right. It's yeah, they came because they were going to be compensated. There's no question that money makes the difference when there's no compensation for donors. There is no donation. That's very well established. And though they may come for the money.

They're personally invested in it because they realize they're doing something altruistic. And when they're informed that for any number of reasons they can't, some of them take it personally. And so we've had to modify how we handle notification of the exclusions. We used to do it, it was automated when they were filling out the questionnaire, if they tripped one of the booby traps.

They'd get an email saying we can't screen any further and that was it. And that was, that was chaotic because it created a lot of phone calls of angry donor candidates saying, why would you do that to me? I want to give my eggs. There's nothing wrong with me. And there may not be anything wrong with them technically, but there's something on the FDA thing that's excluding them or there's something on the questionnaire that's excluding them.

And there's no way around it. We used to, when they were excluded on psych, we used to be the ones to inform them, now the psychologists inform them, when they're excluded based on psych. Because it's not that they're crazy, it's that somewhere on one of the scales where they got assessed, the risk is to them, not actually to the baby.

That going through the process and knowing that you have donor derived offspring out there without being able to know who they are, for some people, that's a little bit psychologically taxing. They should not be donating. And it comes out in the screening. And so the, the way the psychologists now will say to them is, look, there's nothing wrong with you, but here's what got tripped on the testing and this is the reason for the exclusion.

So it's not personal. It's just based on nuts and bolts, what, what can we can allow according to the care standards from our professional organization. It ain't about you personally. And that's been, that's turned out to be way better than having us make the. Notifications that they're excluded. So we learned that.

Um, we also learned that if you tell the truth really starkly about what to expect in terms of pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, people hear it, they hear it right. Yeah, this works great. And the cumulative pregnancy rates, meaning with multiple transfers, there's 85 to 95 percent live birth rates in most donor programs, right over time, but not per transfer.

And so in the course of the conversation, you have to talk to patients about, we learned this along the way. You have to talk to them about the cumulative rates. You have to talk to them about what multiple transfers look like before they reach their goal. You have to. Set expectations, as Monica was saying, and Monica is very good at interacting with her patients.

She's being a little modest by describing the emotional piece, but her patients love her and they get a lot from her over the emotional piece in third party. And that's a very important thing to tend to. If you make it too science, science, science, people kind of glaze over a little bit because in the end, they're talking about their baby.

Right. And they're, you're trying to, you can't science size their babies. And so, you know, the emotional connection, the ability to show somebody that even if you're not feeling what they're feeling, you understand it. 

[00:42:03] Griffin Jones: So I've made a note because I want to ask Monica about that, that counseling. But what you're describing, I would never equate a gamete donor with a job applicant.

Donating gametes isn't applying for a job, but there are parallels. And one of the th One of the things that I would love to be able to do with people that apply for jobs at my company is tell them the reason why I'm not moving them forward. But every HR professional will say, No, you don't do that. You just tell them you just you just give them the thank you and stay, please stay involved and keep us consider us in the future.

And so what to what degree are you informing them of why they weren't selected? 

[00:42:45] Dr. David Shapiro: The donors, when they're not selected, they all get told why. 

[00:42:50] Griffin Jones: They'll get told why. They're told the very specific reason why, or is it kind of, is it a general 

[00:42:55] Dr. David Shapiro: It's going to be a lab test. It's even, so this is the other thing people don't realize.

If you run the FDA panel, and even though the patient, the donor, does not have HIV or hepatitis, a false positive test, even if you can later prove they really don't have the disease, They're excluded. You can't go back and say, Oh, no, that was wrong. And then use the donor. And so you have to tell the donor why she was excluded based on a false positive, because what's she going to do?

She's going to go to the next program down the road and they'll retest her and pretend like she wasn't tested before when she was already excluded. And so, you know, you have to have the paper trail. There is no donor registry. There should be because people who do that should not be approved in another program after they've been properly excluded in the first.

But because there's no registry, we can't keep track of that. So if you say to a donor, Hey, the psych came back with an invalid score, but you're not crazy. There's nothing wrong with you. You're highly functional. Don't worry about it. But this is why The booby trap got tripped then either they're going to take the appropriate amount of time which on the psych is two years And you know wait until they can be retested because they've been told you know, you shouldn't be applying again for two years So we've done our due diligence by telling them the reason We're, we've taken responsibility for saying to a donor, look, you got excluded and by rights, you should always be excluded on some of the testing, or you should be excluded on the site for two years, but it's not permanent.

And then that gives them a framework. And then we can document why we excluded. And if anyone ever comes back and asks for our records, they can see exactly what we did and that we properly counseled the donor so that we're still compliant with FDA. We're still compliant with best practices and.

American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines. And we're doing the right thing for future recipients because some of these exclusions actually do protect the recipient, though most protect the donor. So, we have to tell them. They have to know why. 

[00:45:04] Griffin Jones: Wish we could do that for jobs. Monica, I want to ask you about the counseling prior to treatment when you're counseling a patient on third party options because I noticed some years back that The physician's approach is probably one of the is probably the single biggest variable on determining if they move forward with treatment, provided that, you know, cost isn't a barrier and that sort of thing.

And we really researched it for a while. And I could tell that there is one end of the spectrum. This is just kind of this isn't third party. This is talking about more generally IVF. But there's one end of the spectrum where you can be too prescriptive and the patient feels like they're being pushed into IVF and they or they and they feel like they're not being listened to.

But there is also another end of the spectrum, which I think is easier to err on, actually, where the patient feels like they're getting too many options and they. It's like I'm coming to you the expert and I don't know what I'm supposed to do after this. And I found that the, the, the docs that are, are more prescriptive, as long as they're, they don't go too far, tend to, to, to resonate more with the patients.

Although there's, there's a number of different personality variables, but what is your approach to counseling on third party? What do you find to be? 

[00:46:26] Dr. Monica Best: Um, Yeah, I mean, I think I think of this really from, you know, an efficiency standpoint, and I try to get the patient to see it from that perspective. You know, I have.

A large volume of patients in my practice who are, you know, advanced age and, you know, again, never thought that they would be able to, or never thought that they would get pregnant any other way besides utilizing their own eggs. And, you know, I have to get them to understand that not just RBA, not just Dr.

Best, not just the clinic down the street, but nationally in the world. You know, the limitations to being able to utilize your eggs are going to yield a likely zero percent chance of success. And, and so, you know, we give our patients lots of autonomy at RBA. You know, we, you know, we of course just recently established an age cutoff.

And so we give patients. a lot of autonomy to proceed with IVF with their own eggs. But I think what I do is I really spend a lot of time talking about how, yes, we could do four or five cycles and still not get there. Or we can shift our resources to doing something that's actually going to get them a baby.

And, and potentially multiple siblings from that one cycle. And so, it's oftentimes not just one discussion, it's oftentimes not just one consultation, but it may be, you know, two or three. Again, just. You know, kind of going back to what Danny and I were talking about earlier in that, you know, yes, there are a lot of physicians that don't like doing this and that's why, you know, again, you know, you plant the seed and it's something they never conceived of and then they come, they marinate on it, they come back and you're like, listen, If these are the resources we have to work with, if we really want a baby, then this is the direction that we need to really be, be moving in.

And, and so it's, it's, a lot goes into those discussions and just meeting the patient where they are. You know, some people need data, some people need for you to, you know, just speak to them woman to woman. And, you know, I oftentimes will say, look, I've had my own struggles with infertility and I've been in your shoes before and I understand, you know, kind of what the emotional piece of this is.

And, and oftentimes you'll, you know, you know, some patients may still cycle a couple times and then you just still keep bringing it back home. Okay, so this is what we had, you know, I have a 45 year old recently who, you know, Had like six blast biopsy at each cycle and everything's abnormal. And of course, you know, I said we, we would have to do an inordinate number of cycles and you just don't even have the time left to be able to do that and still be efficient.

[00:49:45] Dr. David Shapiro: If, if I may, there's, there's another part of the counseling that I lucked into by accident. It just sort of flew out of my mouth one day and it turned out to be one of my stock statements because it worked and it's true. Which is that DN That's half 

[00:49:58] Griffin Jones: of my sales pieces, by the way, Danny, half of, half of my sales scripts are from just, Oh, that worked that one time, somebody that's, the light bulb went off.

I should use that one again. But yours are DNA 

[00:50:11] Dr. David Shapiro: might be destiny, but it isn't parenthood. Right. And so what we're getting to with egg donation, and same with third party surrogacy with people carrying, um, a baby's a human being that's going to have its own soul that it's naturally wired for, but that is influenced by the people who raised it.

And, yeah, the DNA may Direct the behavior in one way or the other, and intelligence may vary a little bit. But in the end, the parental influence is the bottom line. And the experience of carrying a baby, even if it isn't your DNA, it's your baby, right? By everyone's definition, except the genetic one. You deliver the baby, you experience pregnancy, you experience the, the aches and the pains and the terror with, uh, contraction at 22 weeks, all of that makes you a mom.

And so when women start, and again, this is an old man having this conversation, but when I introduced that concept, I see younger women's eyes kind of go, Oh yeah, right. And it opens the door. It doesn't always get them through. But it opens the door, they may 

[00:51:28] Dr. Monica Best: need another consult to hear it again, you know, or more or more and I think to, you know, as couples go through this process and I'm just speaking of like kind of just, you know, your routine, you know, couple where the woman has diminished of Aaron reserve and, you know, you're going to use the partner sperm.

I mean, that's. That's, that's a huge advantage because patients are like, okay, well, what about adoption? What about this? Or what about that? And just kind of going back to what Dani was saying, you know, just being able to tell patients, you know, you have the opportunity to experience pregnancy. Your partner has a genetic link.

Even though you don't have that same genetic link, your, your genes and your body are influencing the expression of those genes. And it's a, it's powerful. It's really, really powerful to patients. And, you know, again, they see that, that advantage. And I think just from an efficiency standpoint financially, it's just as efficient, if not more efficient than adoption in many ways.

And you get this added benefit of being able to carry and potentially your partner having a genetic link, if that's It's the scenario, you know, and so it's just, it is, it is extremely rewarding. And I tell patients, I've never had a patient who pursued egg donation who regretted it when they saw 

[00:52:55] Dr. David Shapiro: absolutely 100 percent agree with that.

[00:52:58] Griffin Jones: There's no way to, yeah, there's absolutely no way to. 

[00:53:01] Dr. David Shapiro: That's right. I, and I won't, and I've never seen it either and I've been doing it longer and I'm going to retire in the next 10 years and I won't see it before then either. Yeah. So I 

[00:53:10] Griffin Jones: think I want to conclude with what you see as the roadblocks that can and should be removed, converting and, and, and, and for the providing third party IVF treatment for those that need it outside of the payer stuff.

So don't not, not coverage and let's, let's pretend that that's solved for or will be solved for. Let's pretend that for this conversation and as specifically as you can think, what are the technological or process impediments if, if, but for those, uh, we would be seeing a lot more third party IVF patients.

[00:53:48] Dr. David Shapiro: Depends if you're talking about surrogacy or egg donation. Either. Your pick. The barrier to egg donation is the supply of egg donors. If, if you build it, they will come. You know, there's between 18 and 25, 000 egg donation cycles a year in the U. S. And the demand is far greater than that. And so the limiting factor right now is the availability of donors.

And so anything we could do sociologically, technically, medically, financially, to make donation appealing to young women and safe, um, at the same time. Yeah, that would, that would grease the wheel on the egg donor side. Surrogacy is a little different though. That's, I think that's a social, a socialization process is going to take a while.

Because, you know, right now most surrogates are paid. And surrogacy is the kind of thing a sister can do, a best friend can do for you. The more sociologically this becomes. De rigueur, actually, the more I think people will be showing up with friends and siblings and not paying the agents and not paying surrogates for hire.

That's going to take a long time, but that's, in my opinion, a sociologic barrier that will eventually fall, but it's going to be a while. 

[00:55:04] Griffin Jones: I've got to ask the AI question because it seems like every, no matter what subtopic of the fertility field we're talking about, there's some application for AI and often we're talking about it on the lab side.

Where do you see applications for AI in the next two or three years with regard to whether it's, whether it's donor selection or whether it's gamete grading or embryo grading or what are the applications you see for third party? 

[00:55:33] Dr. David Shapiro: All of it. How close are we? We're there. It's the ultrasound that we demoed the other day has an AI function to make sure the follicular diameters are exact and reliable and reproducible.

And it's the first system we've seen that has an AI function in it to guarantee that what you're getting is a true representation of what's in the ovary. It's a quick, much quicker scan. It just right through the ovary, every follicle gets. Uh, counted almost instantaneously the exact shape, the location, an accurate number of follicles, right?

Ultrasonographers are human beings and they're real good, but sometimes they're under counts, sometimes they're over counts and that gets the patient expectation and what it's like in the retrieval suite if they think they're getting 30 eggs and only five come out, right? So AI and ultrasound is already there.

It'll be there in embryo grading. If it isn't already in some practices, I think there's a program that's been released already, but I haven't seen it. I think it's going to help us determine who's going to be a good responder and a not good responder, because AMH, though a very good tool, is not a perfect tool, right?

We're going to be, all the predictive modeling that goes into AI, is going to help reproductive endocrinologists know who should be a donor and who shouldn't, who should be a recipient and who shouldn't, who's likely to get pregnant and who's not. Right? And you can, you can show all of this to the patient and say, here's what the math is saying.

Here's what we can do to either bypass or trick the math, but here's what it says. 

[00:57:14] Dr. Monica Best: Everything. Everything. It's going to be everything. Like I want to know, I want to know down to, I want AI to tell me down to which eggs we should be fertilizing and which sperm we should be picking up to do ICSI with. You know, or, you know, because I mean, I think, I mean, again, there's just so many applications to that, you know, women that are coming in and freezing their eggs, like, okay, well, we can't genetically test eggs, but is there some function?

I mean, again, that I would. You know, that would be right. 

[00:57:44] Dr. David Shapiro: Is there something in the microscopy that I could recognize? Is there something in the stimulation in that you plug into an AI function and it tells you which set of eggs are going to work better within a cohort, right? Which egg is the one you should use first, right?

Yeah, all of that's coming. 

[00:58:03] Griffin Jones: Dr. Monica Best, Dr. Danny Shapiro, thank you both for coming on, sharing your thoughts of what is happening now in third party IVF, what needs to come so that more third party IVF patients are able to be served. Thank you both for coming on the program. 

[00:58:21] Dr. Monica Best: Thank you so much for having us.

[00:58:24] Sponsor: Guide your patients to Mind360 for immediate access to high quality psychological evaluations and fertility mental health tools. Don't delay your patient's cycle. Find out how quickly this process can be completed by downloading their free report at mind360.us/reducedwaittime

Announcer: Today's advertiser helped make the production and delivery of this episode possible for free to you.

But the themes expressed by the guest do not necessarily reflect the fuse of inside reproductive health, nor of the advertiser. The advertiser does not have editorial control over the content of this episode and the guest's appearance is not an endorsement of the advertiser. Thank you for listening to Inside Reproductive Health.

197 Human Trafficking in Donor Egg IVF. How to Protect Your Clinic and Patients Featuring Diana Thomas

DISCLAIMER: Today’s episode is paid content from our feature sponsor, who helps Inside Reproductive Health to deliver information for free, to you! Here, the Advertiser has editorial control. Feature sponsorship is not an endorsement, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Inside Reproductive Health.


This may be the most serious topic we’ve discussed on Inside Reproductive Health, and it is a vital conversation to be having in the fertility space. The buying and selling of human trafficked eggs.

Diana Thomas, CEO and Founder of The World Egg and Sperm Bank and an early recipient of donor egg IVF, addresses the concerning rise in trafficked eggs reaching clinics and patients, along with the associated legal and ethical concerns.

Diana talks about:

  • The spike in donor eggs from developing countries (And how many of them are flagged as high risk for human trafficking)

  • How victims are coached to amend their profiles to look upper class (Reducing suspicion of exploitation)

  • Specific examples of different egg donor agencies and banks where there’s contradicting information regarding donor information.

  • A new Human Trafficking Act (Including the legal and financial implications)

  • TWESB’s strict protocols to minimize the risk of providing trafficked eggs to their patients

  • Her checklist any clinic can use to help ensure they are not buying and selling trafficked eggs


Diana Thomas LinkedIn
The World Egg and Sperm Bank

Transcript

Diana Thomas  00:00

Prevalent isn't even a good enough word. It's flooded our markets. And it's amazing to me that doctors and radiologists and patients don't have a clue what's going on the certainly that everybody says well, the aids are cheaper from there. But those savings are not being passed on to the patient they're still paying $22,000 per cohort.

Sponsor  00:22

This episode was made possible by our feature sponsor The World Egg and Sperm Bank, head over to www.theworldeggandspermbank.com/protect and download their free due diligence checklist to ensure that your program only sells eggs from donors that have been safely and ethically protected. That's theworldeggandspermbank.com/protect. Today's episode is paid content from our feature sponsor who helps inside reproductive health to deliver information for free to you. Here the advertiser has editorial control. Feature sponsorship is not an endorsement and does not necessarily reflect the views of Inside Reproductive Health.

Griffin Jones  01:12

This is one of the most serious topics we've ever covered on the inside reproductive health podcast off the top of my head from what I can think of from 200 episodes. It's the most serious it has to do with the trafficking of young women and exploiting them to sell their oocytes unsafely at a profit a huge profit. To me, it seems the worst case scenario is this is something that's happening with hundreds, maybe even 1000s of cases. And the best case scenario, as far as I can tell is that clinics are very vulnerable to using and selling eggs from women who've been victims of trafficking because from what I see the chain of custody isn't secure enough. There's too much movement, too much uncertainty, I'm not qualified to say but my guest has done a lot more research in this area. Her name is Diana Thomas, you know, or is the founder and CEO of The World Egg and Sperm Bank. Not only was she among the very first of agencies and banks, she was among the very first patients to be the recipient of donor egg IVF. She found her own donor made her own contract had children from donor egg IVF then started doing that for other fertility doctors and other fertility clinics who recruited her to find other donors for their other patients. Diane talks about the changes that she made in 2014, 2015 as vitrification became more popular, but then people were stimulating differently. They were freezing differently. They were shipping differently. They're all these different spokes in the custody wheel. So her egg bank centralized everything stimulation shipping recruitment screening protocols gave a really tight bead on quality assurance around 2018 and 2019 is when Diana saw a really large spike of imported eggs coming into the UK and Canada and the United States from developing countries. Many of these countries had been flagged by the US State Department for being high risk for human trafficking. Diana says it's not just a correlation. There have been articles about very large arrests happening with human trafficking and coercion for egg donors. The most recent one at time of this episode Aug. 23, just happened on the Greek island of Crete. She references the pH dissertation of a whistleblower from a Ukrainian clinic who talks about how Ukrainian records are falsified. Women are forced to sign consents, they're pushed into doing far more retrievals than you would she gives one example where a woman did 24 Egg retrievals to an estimated 600 eggs 480 that are viable at cohorts of six maybe 40 children from one Ukrainian donor and according to the reports of the whistleblower, that donor was paid $100 per donation where the other parties including the criminals, but also including the clinics and egg banks made a lot more money than that. Danna talks about Ukrainian clinics trying to sell off eggs at $200 apiece because of their compliance issues with the FDA. So they sell through a Canadian cryobank Danna goes through examples from different egg donor agencies and banks, where there's contradicting information. She said she lives in one place. But then the other part of the profile she said she's Ukrainian doesn't have a green card yet. And another profile says that she's seeking asylum. She talks about how donors are coached to amend their profiles, so they see more upper class so that American Canadian and British and Australian recipients are less likely to suspect her exploitation. So as Diana what she does differently, she talks about the residency requirements for her donors. She talks about the identity requirements for donors, the multi-phase personality test that's required from each of her donors, the human trafficking protocol protocol that they have for their donors, how she can be so much more certain that their donated eggs are coming from women who have not been trafficked. There's of course huge ethical implications. There's legal implications down to the clinic and the provider Diana talks about a new human trap Thinking Act and the legal and financial implications from that. And I give a business and a public relations warning. Many of you are CEOs, many of your practice owners imagine trying to sell your practice. Imagine trying to sell your fertility network to another network or buy another network to go public with your network done all this marketing gotten all this by in about your mission and values. And a major media investigation reveals that donor eggs that you're using for big profit are coming from women who've been coerced and exploited and trafficked. The human concern comes first. This is something you have to look into The World Egg and Sperm Bank has a checklist for your due diligence for protecting yourselves from human traffic tags, protecting your patients from that ultimately protecting the donors. That checklist talks about ownership history, donor sources, chain of custody accountability, practice liabilities and donor care. Use that checklist as an agenda for meeting with your leadership team. You can get it on The World Egg and Sperm Bank website, we're gonna link to it on this episode page link to it in the ads we run with this episode, we'll link to it in the email that this episode comes out in. But do your due diligence because this could be a major threat to your company. Now on to my conversation with Diana Thomas, CEO of The World Egg and Sperm Bank. Ms. Thomas, Diana, welcome to the Inside Reproductive Health podcast.

Diana Thomas  06:17

Thank you excited to be here.

Griffin Jones  06:19

I could spend probably an entire episode just talking about your background. So I don't want to spend all of the time in there because we have an important topic to touch on an important topic that we should all be concerned about we that we should all be investigating and making sure that safeguards are in place that it isn't happening. But your background is really really interesting to me. So I want to give a little synopsis and you tell me if I got it right. But sounds like you were living in Canada in the mid 90s. It's around 1995. You need assisted reproductive technology, the waitlist in Canada for IVF is several months and no donors are available there at that time. You move back to Phoenix, Arizona, where you're originally from, they can do donor egg IVF. But they're not doing Ixy or anything and they don't have like their own egg donors available. They don't have banks that they're working with. So they tell you, yeah, sure, if you can find one, we'll we'll use that person's egg you recruit your own egg donor from the Arizona State campus. And then you write your own contract for for that there wasn't like third party contracts at that time. So you write that. And and you went, you decided to go with open identity from the very beginning. How close am I to having that, right?

Diana Thomas  07:54

Yeah, pretty close. Except I was in Canada and in the mid 80s when I actually started in IVs. So it was right at the beginning of really that then creation of the industry.

Griffin Jones  08:05

So you start you were you had gone through some cycles, but it was 1995 when you did your first donor cycle in in red. Yeah, Sona. Yes,

Diana Thomas  08:13

I went through phase one. Yes. Yeah. So your learning was after 15 years of Toronto.

Griffin Jones  08:19

You're learning everything on your own at this point as you're going through it. And then at that point, someone says to you, Hey, can you do that for our other patients? Was it the clinic that you had went to see? Did they tell other fertility doctors? How did fertility doctors start calling you and asking if you could find donors for their patients?

Diana Thomas  08:42

It did start at the clinic that I had conceived through. And I also can see through my second children, my twins through another clinic, but basically it was the doctors from those clinics calling me and then I don't know, we're just really spread. I started getting phone calls from intended parents, just begging me to help find downers.

Griffin Jones  09:04

In the beginning. Would you say that you were an agency rather than a bank?

Diana Thomas  09:09

Oh, absolutely. There. Yeah, there was no egg freezing at all at the time, not until 2005 2004. So it was it was a fresh donor agency that I started then.

Griffin Jones  09:21

And so it was about 2015 where you started to make your company into an egg bank.

Diana Thomas  09:29

Now we became an egg bank in 2004 was slow freeze technology. And we had our first baby that was documented on Good Morning America in 2005 through Frozen egg out of Lexington, Kentucky. So we began recruiting donors just for the bank. But at the time the slow free technology wasn't nearly as good I think pregnancy rates around 32% At that time, so we switched over to vitrification in 2009 And what were freezing eggs then at the same time, up until about 2010, I was also doing fresh donor cycles around the country, taking downers to different blog posts, and

Griffin Jones  10:12

So vitrification starts to take off. And then in 2014, I had read something where you said, you started to find out that quality couldn't be assured. And I think that has something to do with different eggs being vitrified at different clinics sold to different banks, and then being incentivized on as many retrievals as possible and tied to the sale of the donor egg. So can you tell us about what you started to see in 2014?

Diana Thomas  10:44

Well, you know, we were an egg bank, probably six or seven years before any other egg bank came onto the market. We were egg banks before. Actually I was I was a donor agency before there are any hands around guidelines. So we're now contracts. So as you know, there wasn't even FDA testing on donors at the time, in those early days. So I started to see that the business model that other people were forming, was to do outside networks retrieval, say contact various clinics to do their retrievals. And I tried that with a couple of clinics to start and I realized, there was no way to really control the quality i i couldn't depend on if I worked with this doctor, he would hyper stem the dollars that I worked with this doctor, they would only get five eggs, because they were afraid of high percent. It just there was no way to control the actual process for the donor. And because egg freezing was so very new at the time, not a lot of people knew how to do it. And we would send in our own embryologist to to freeze it at those network clients, but we still could not. We just couldn't track family limits, we couldn't do all the things we want it to do. So I said we just have to start a whole new business model. And that is a centralized model, which contains everything on location from recruiting, to stimulation to freezing, to shipping, and we could manage all the family limits all the testing, all the egg freezing, and all the shipping. So we ended up having incredibly good success rates doing it that way.

Griffin Jones  12:23

So that's what I was thinking of what happened in 2014 and 2015. So by 2015, you are doing everything the same way protocols screening stem, vitrification storage, the way you ship that's all uniform across the board.

Diana Thomas  12:39

Correct. Same staff, same experience, people. Yep, same protocols.

Griffin Jones  12:45

So it this time, you're really starting to build quality assurance that is locked down. And because of that, you can probably see when ever there's some variance in that quality, or if there are gaps in the QA piece of it. And then you start to see a trend happening in 2018 and 2019 have of eggs coming from other countries. Tell us about that. Or maybe not even other countries, but particularly from developing countries.

Diana Thomas  13:18

Yeah, I I really was rather unaware of it until probably two years ago. But I know all of the reading and research I've done it did start much earlier. In fact, there's a clinic in Chicago that's identified in the book, The Red market, that talks about donors being shipped into Chicago and retrieved and then sent back home. So it's been around a while it's just become so incredibly overwhelming. I mean, it's right now developing country, extra developing countries and sperm now, by the way, is really flooding just flooding the US market and the Canadian market and the UK market. And it's really a lot more information has come out about what's going on behind the scenes. That's truly alarming. very alarming. Why

Griffin Jones  14:09

2018 2019? What was it about that time period that this trend started to happen?

Diana Thomas  14:16

I think it was the globalization, the economic globalization and IVF really ticked up. And most of this, most of this is really driven by global funding and global purchases of US companies that Canadian companies and UK companies. So yeah, they have strong ties in European countries and other countries. So they're, they could see a huge profit margin by doing it this way. And I'd love to give you an example. If you're ready to hear one anytime. How much money people make up first.

Griffin Jones  14:49

Yeah, hold on to that example for one second, because I want to ask you, you said that it's alarming. Why is it alarming?

Diana Thomas  14:55

Well, any human trafficking should be alarming to anyone. There The fact that all of these eggs are coming from, from countries well known for human trafficking, human trafficking stems from organized crime. And that you can go on to the government, US Department of State and see annual reports published about every country's human trafficking behaviors. And statistics is well known and well documented. There, they estimate 60,000 Russian women are human trafficked a year and prior to the war in Ukraine, at least 6000 Ukrainian women were and those are the ones that are reported. So it's not a thing. It just happens once in a while, or maybe one donor is treated poorly. I know, the 1000s that are listed on websites, you know, downer concierge, boasts 25,000 donors.

Griffin Jones  15:50

So there's alarm because these two things are happening in parallel one, you have a big rise in eggs coming from developing countries. And they also happen to be countries where human trafficking is a really big problem. And so

Diana Thomas  16:07

It's been documented, as well, there have been people have documented these specific donors, and specific instances of that of this. And I have plenty of references I could make to some of those documents. But it's also that's yeah, human trafficking is it's everybody should just stop there. But then there's also who's telling recipients that this is going on, and who can validate any of the data, medical data. There have been two recent arrests that show that the the medical data is falsified. For egg donation for genetic material being sold to the west. One article just came out this month 71 donors that were rescued from an organized trafficking ring and gray. So I think that, you know that the cycle we don't understand is these women are trafficked. And they're trafficking with fraudulent promises of vacations or jobs or or were and then they're putting the dancing clubs and prostitution, with Ed backing on the side. So do we really think that these some of these women don't have HIV? Who, whose blood is being tested? Who's Who's tracking the chain of custody for any of the testing that's gone on in Europe that each and then track that the actual documents down much less? Now, the chain of custody especially? Well, I'll wait for you to ask more questions. 

Griffin Jones  17:40

Tell us about the example you're thinking of,

Diana Thomas  17:43

Well, if there's a great documents, if people are really, really don't believe this is going on by pulling up the lens, the Lascaux who's did her dissertation and Indiana University in 2021, and lived in Ukraine, and worked at a Ukrainian egg bank for three years. So she came back with all kinds of interviews and documentation and explanation of how the process works and how records are falsified and how donors are, are called the consent sign these consent so they will can't donate. They're not going to get paid or just the coercion an inherent in almost every step of the process. And coercion of vulnerable women is a definition of human trafficking. So Natalia, for example, was interviewed by Polina and she donated so far and 2021 24 times all the records that we get them on these women's say, donation up to up to six times. And they were in four or five different countries, she got paid about $100 per donation. So that's $2,400, she produced around 600 eggs on an average cycle, maybe 480 will mature out of those 24 cycles. So that those 280 couples, six cohorts of six those 280 couples around the world, meaning there's probably 40 children from this one Boughner that's just the egg side of it, but the money side of it is she gets walks away with $2,400. The broker pimps that bring them in and the doctors that retrieved the eggs are making $7,500 per cohort of six. And I know that I've got emails from people offering me those prices. So they're making $600,000 Right there. Then they sell the eggs to us egg banks and Canadian egg banks and Canadian doctors who turn around and sell them for 20 to $2,000 to their patients. So the doctors in this country and the UK and Canada are making $20,000 off to off of a single board of eggs. So around this stellato was worth around $2.6 million. And we are supporting organized crime in that purchase.

Griffin Jones  20:07

How does the report know discover that this donor had did 24 retrievals? When you know, it may have been reported that she did four, six, how did how did they discover that she had done 24.

Diana Thomas  20:21

She works in a clinic that sent her out. And that was she wasn't the only one she documented. She documented a number of them. I just picked that one out as an example. So some were up to 15 times, some were more than that. They go they go to Israel, they go to the US, they go to Spain, and they retrieve in Ukraine.

Griffin Jones  20:44

So this pullin of Valeska Am I saying her name correctly? Polenta malesko. She's a whistleblower. She works at a Ukrainian clinic or worked at a Ukrainian clinic. And this is what she's observed from the patients coming through.

Diana Thomas  20:57

Well, it's also her PhD dissertation. So it wasn't just journalism. See now, and she didn't get her PhD, she had to defend this dissertation.

Griffin Jones  21:09

So you have someone that is getting $100, that when we know that the total compensation is a lot more than that, and that's going to different people, it's going to the people doing the retrievals is going to people that are bringing her in. And that's also way more than it's way more retrievals than we would expect to be safe for, for anyone, right? And so So are we are we mostly worried about this happening with women that are in these particular countries? So if it's Ukraine, or Georgia or Russia, or are we worried about the trafficking that's happening to Ukrainian, Georgian Russian women? Or are we also worried about people that are being trafficked into those countries like Turkmenistan, or the UAE or other countries where people are being removed from and brought into which is it Are they are they both are concerned,

Diana Thomas  22:10

all are concerned, because they're all forms of human trafficking and where we're supporting organized crime by buying those eggs, and supporting the cycle of violence and coercion with women around the world. It's also, if you look at the US Department of State report on Spain, for example, it's considered one of the worst locations for trafficking women into Spain. And they're coming now from Bolivia and Chile and Venezuela and Brazil, and Colombia and Nigeria. And that's it's all documented in the US Department of State records that this is going on. So these women get into these places, they also document that they're confined in apartments. So they're used for prostitution, you know, it's a model that the organized crime is calling the renewable resource model. So these women are considered renewable resources because you can use them all up and use them again and again and again. Prostitution, modeling, dancing, egg retrieval, surrogacy, the one that was arrested this month was for all three of those things. Prostitution, surrogacy and egg retrievals

Griffin Jones  23:21

Can you tell us about that arrest? I was unfamiliar with this story. Oh,

Diana Thomas  23:25

yeah. It just came out on August 20. Around that time, I think. Yeah, I think I've gotten on my on my LinkedIn of that. But basically, doctors, secretaries, embryo embryologist organized crime, in particular persons were all arrested for because of 98 women that were being used for prostitution, surrogacy and egg retrievals for egg donation. And in the arrest, they found all the medical documents falsified, consents falsified. It was they rescue these women from confinement? Was this also in Ukraine. Now there it was in Greece, and which is really interesting. It's the second arrests, it was large like that the other one was in 2019. There, but there were women from Russia, from Ukraine, from Latvia of Georgia, and other countries that were sent to grace to be retrieved.

Griffin Jones  24:24

And so and Cyprus is an area that has been dinged for human trafficking in the past, and neighbor to Greece. And so women are both vulnerable in these countries, and then they're vulnerable from other countries that go through these countries. You have have I've given talks before where you go through profiles of different donor egg banks, and there's contradicting information in the profiles you know, the things will say like, she's in London or she's in Florida, but they Then you read through the rest of the profile, and she's in the Ukraine or she doesn't have a green card, it says, Green Card pending does. So it's like, Well, is she? Is she actually in Florida? Or like, or are they in Florida? Like they're and and you know, there's ones where it's like it says, seeking asylum. It says that in the profile. And so tell us about these examples?

Diana Thomas  25:25

Well, I mean, there are 1000s of them. And you know, I, people say to me, Well, who's doing that in the US? And I basically because I would say who isn't? We really, I believe that almost every egg bank is and they're also shipping them to Canada to cannamd cryo bank. And we had somebody approached us at ESHRE, from Ukraine, trying to sell to dump the eggs for $200 because the FDA is coming down on them, and said, you have to buy them from Ken Ham cryo. So send your patients there, we'll ship all of our eggs to Canada. Because it's there's no FDA in Canada. So there's no there's no, there's absolutely no verification of the of the testing that's going on from these donors. So they go from, you know, Ukraine, to Poland to Spain, to a bank in the US to a Canadian egg bank in and out of tanks. And people are buying them and have no clue where they originally from. And there's no disclosure at when they're when they're purchased by recipients. That that any of this is going on, people assume that if it's in the United States or Canada, it's legal and it's healthy, and it's safe.

Griffin Jones  26:43

That seems to be a big chain of custody. Yeah, that can be easily obscured. Because yeah, it's it seems to me that, that you can feel like, Oh, this is the source, but you don't actually know the source because it didn't come from this agency or this clinic and get shipped to this clinic or this agency. It was brokered by yet another intermediary that was trying to unload Oh sites for reasons that you thought, Oh, we're in Ukraine, and things are really bad. And we're so we're going to try to sell eggs at a discount, and but you have to go through this other person. And ultimately, the patient really isn't aware of, of that long chain of custody. How familiar are the clinicians with that long chain of custody? Do they know where eggs are coming from?

Diana Thomas  27:35

I really don't think so. No one has really stopped to ask the question until recently, we've been trying to educate people about asking questions, which is why I've done a checklist for people to start asking questions. In order to determine where the ACE came from, or or if they have answers. I did an online survey in April, just a quick, quick and dirty to embryologist Do you know the source of the anchor warming? Only 33% of them and the end was only 200. So it's not it wasn't huge, but it's a pretty good indication. embryologists are really honest, if they do answer directly. And of those people that that did. Now, they knew that 50% of them they thought came from the US. But that's because the US egg bank name is on the shipment. And the other 50% knew they came from Eastern Europe, because they sponsor a clinic, or from the UK, which is really just another transit country because they don't retrieve eggs and send them out from the UK, and, and Spain. So people are aware that it's happening, and they're entering that data as a soccer clinic and the sorry.

Griffin Jones  28:48

And so I think that the any egg bank would say, Oh, well, they do say because you go to their website. In fact, one of the examples that you had in, in your talk, you point out all you show the map of where they're getting their donors from from a month. I think it's like 20, they say 20,000 donors available is on. And of course right on their homepage. They say each of our egg donors is required to complete a rigorous application and screening process prior to being added into our database for their safety and for the health and general health of your future baby. We document and verify every egg donors identity, education and mental physical and reproductive health. Why is that wrong? How can how can it how they're all going to say the same thing? What in your view is insufficient about what they're doing? 

Diana Thomas  29:49

Well, it's all a lie. They're marketing to the Western market, which you go to a Polina dissertation she talks about how the session with the psychologist is how to how to amend their profile to make the look like educated white middle class women so that people in the Western world don't feel guilty, getting eggs for poor abuse women who are not educated. So they falsify their talents, as you saw in one of the donors who had spoke five languages, including ancient Latin, played jazz and classical piano, and had a real estate degree, but she's a freelance model. It you know, really I? And they are saying they're not lying about any of that stuff. When you have done people getting arrested for false records, and who, who actually validates any of it? How do you know the eight you can actually the blood you get is from the same donor who's anxious you get? Because they say so is that gonna hold up in court is that going to hold up to the FDA and FDA audit will look at their website, they say they do all is, if they want to steal it, it's it's, and yet, people like us, who actually do it all the right way, are held accountable, and can be prosecuted for not following the law.

Griffin Jones  31:15

I know what's going to happen after this episode comes out, people are gonna hear it, CEOs of networks are going to hear it, doctors are gonna hear it lab directors are gonna hear it and they're gonna say, Oh, crud, they're gonna go to your website, they're gonna download the checklist, and then they're gonna go to whoever they're buying eggs from right now. And they're gonna say, how do we know that you're that you're not going to? Or how do we know that you're actually safeguarding and making sure that these are from donors who are properly verified, who are safeguarded or not traffic? And those egg banks are gonna inevitably going to say, we this is what we do, we've got it all under control. Are they lying, in your view? Or is there something that those egg banks aren't doing? Even if they have good intentions to properly verify the chain of custody?

Diana Thomas  32:08

Well, the question is, are you going to stick your clinic reputation on that? When when a baby is born and out to your clinic with HIV? Are you going to say, well, they told me, I believe them? There is no source documentation that can be discovered in a court of law. You know, they there's documentation that the stuff is falsified? And do they do it for every person? What the question is who, who is a third party that's not making money off this, this auditing them? There is nobody. So when they say that they are FDA registered? Yeah, you can be FDA registered, and the FDA has this wonderful little loophole that's abused by Western clinics is that it says if you sponsor he sponsor that clinic in Ukraine, you're verifying your personally stating you believe that they're actually doing FDA compliance. So they send the eggs over, but there's no documentation. And if they do get documentation, how do you know the chain of custody for the blood work that was done? But that when an f1, and f2 agent goes to your lab, what are they looking for, they're looking for, for real proof that there's infectious disease testing going on for this particular set of A's. And that that's just not going to be there?

Griffin Jones  33:33

What would proper identity verification look like?

Diana Thomas  33:36

Well, I'm not sure that really matters when you traffic, your trafficking, whether you identify them correctly or not, you know, the act of trafficking, supersedes all else. Because the act of trafficking is is against the law and is punishable. And if it doesn't mean that you're not trafficking, because you bought the eggs you didn't know she was trafficked. You buy stolen goods, you have to return them. It's it you are accountable. You're liable. You're transferring those eggs into your patient. You're the last person to say well, yeah, I trusted them over there. I believe that and how, how do they know? I mean, we're talking about Ukraine, but they're getting eggs to Bolivia and Chile and all different sets of all different countries. So they believe all those doctors, they just believe everybody. That's okay. You that's what's going on. When what is documented, there's so much human trafficking going on in those places. There's specific instances of it. It's just all over the place all over the internet, if you want to better the US Department of State.

Griffin Jones  34:42

Yeah, especially in countries that are war torn like Ukraine or bad state actors like Russia, where no one trusts what's coming out of Russia typically. And so why would you trust the so if you didn't trust the Olympics, if you didn't trust fraud and You know, involvement in in other countries and, and and sabotaging other people's internet infrastructure? And then, but but you're going to say no, but for sure we know that they're safely doing egg donation. Yeah.

Diana Thomas  35:17

Any organized crime drug lords run Bolivia and Colombia? You know, it's not really a disconnect there.

Griffin Jones  35:26

Yeah, it seems it seems too high risk for for my taste to be having those eggs come from other places especially because to your point, you could have the proper identity verification, but that it okay this is the donor Diana Thomas but we didn't know that Griffin Jones or someone else didn't make her come here and is stealing her compensation and then forcing her to do that over and over again and, and other things. And so what is it about what you're doing at the World egg and sperm bank that you feel very confident that we know our donors aren't coming from human draft trafficked places, we know that they're not being coerced into doing this, we know exactly who they are, where the eggs are coming from, where they're going, what is it that you're doing differently?

Diana Thomas  36:19

Well, first of all, we do everything in one location. So we have one building, every single donor comes through our door, we see them, we know them, we take their ID, which is usually a passport and a driver's license. And another form of ID if we can they are interviewed here they are interviewed independently outside of here by psychologists. They do MMPI to show that they're whether they're lying or not. They're also interviewed by doctors that are also on contract outside of us. So we're not trying to manipulate the outcome. And anybody who comes in the store from the United States, we only use donors that are US donors who are residents, because you have to be able to ask them back, if you're going to follow family limits and international laws. We actually limit our donations to 10 families worldwide for egg and sperm. So these women come in, we know who they are. But we also these women have opportunity. They're educated, they have an opportunity for other work. They have legal support if they feel that we're doing something wrong. And every document and every person and procedure we do in here can be discovered in a court of law. So we are accountable from beginning to end for our donors. All of your donors are us owe them. Ali, I think we've had, we have had a few Canadian donors, but I would say in the end, 10 years, we've had like three.

Griffin Jones  37:50

And then they're all donating at the lab in Phoenix,

Diana Thomas  37:54

all of them are retrieved in our one location. And they're frozen here. And they're shipped from here. And so there's no other how we ship tail, there's no excess handling of the eggs, they go from our lab, to the clinics lab.

Griffin Jones  38:10

So you can be a lot more sure of who they are and where they're coming from. When you said MMPI that was the first I heard of that you said that it helps to detect if they're, if they're telling the truth or not. Tell us more about what that is, is the first time I'm hearing of it. 

Diana Thomas  38:30

Yeah, I started it when I started working with egg donors in the 90s. But it's MMPI is multi phasic personality disorder tasks that psychologists use. So it's a, you know, 700 questions that you have to answer in an hour. So it detects consistency. Or if you're misrepresenting yourself or you're trying to make, make yourself look to do but it's analyzed in a program that psychologists have been using for decades and decades, and identifies people that have compulsive lying, or they're borderline schizophrenic or their various disorders that show up in that testing.

Griffin Jones  39:07

Is that the same thing as the Minnesota some Yes, yes, we have now, it was like 561 is okay, I just was so I've taken that before years ago, probably 20 years ago. It's a 567 questions. I think it took me way longer than our if I recall correctly, I think it took me like three different hour sessions to do it. Now. I'm a slow test taker. But so when when or every single donor is doing this? 

Diana Thomas  39:36

Yeah, and they're only given an hour, that's part of the testing the parameters of the testing, because they don't want you to think about all the responses too long. That's that's kind of the whole idea, but and they'll ask the same question for you know, 20 different ways. It you know, and you you tend to go through very quickly so your answers are very spontaneous. And you're doing this forever. Every single donor are just so all of them. I've done it for 25 years. Wow.

Griffin Jones  40:07

So is anybody else doing that specific test for their donors that,

Diana Thomas  40:12

you know, I think there used to be some people that did it, I, I really haven't kept up with what other people are doing to be frank with. So I suspect they're doing that or some version of it, there's another version that's not quite as intense as well, so I think and then there's people who just sit there and talk to them for half an hour, and they write up a paragraph and that's it, which is really probably most of them. But the psychology you know, interview in Ukraine was documented as being a how to how to doctor your profile meeting and the consents. Actually, in the law state that purse traffic that's person a person that is traffic, and signs a consent, that consent is entirely invalid.

Griffin Jones  41:02

Because they want to Doctor their profile, because if they seem more affluent if they seem like they're upper class or upper middle class, then you kind of reason by proxy, I heard you say in your talk, that they it's well, you know, if they've studied at university, and they have a master's or, or they have, maybe not even those, but they speak six languages, one of them, one of which is ancient Latin, and they've studied philosophy, and they they're a jazz pianist, and concert violinist and all these other things than you think, Oh, they can't be coming from downtrodden conditions.

Diana Thomas  41:39

It's it's kind of appeals to our western culture. We don't like abuse. We don't like human trafficking. Most of us haven't been exposed to it at all. It's, it's hard to even accept that this is happening right under our noses. And people are going to start being held accountable for it. And I wish people would listen and not get in trouble over it. But if we're going to keep sponsoring, organized crime, the aids are going to keep coming until somebody really gets in trouble over. But it is a way for us to feel comfortable that that these women are not being trafficked. 

Griffin Jones  42:16

The women in some of these other countries are being coached to to elaborate and fabricate on their donation profiles, where you're putting them through a pretty rigorous personality test to make sure that this is who you say you are, and that, you know, some of these other personality disorders are screened away.

Diana Thomas  42:38

And it's also somebody outside of my organization. She's an independent psychologists. So she's got her reputation and her license to protect so she's not lying to tell me what I want to hear. Lie to tell me the truth.


Griffin Jones  42:55

Are there is there anyone else any other egg banks that you know of that that all of their donors are US residents?

Diana Thomas  43:02

is prevalent isn't even a good enough word. It's flooded our markets. And it's amazing to me that doctors and radiologists and patients don't have a clue what's going on? That certainly that everybody says well the answer cheaper from there. But those savings are not being passed on to the patient. They're still paying $22,000 per cohort. And they and they're getting something they don't really know what they're getting now.

Griffin Jones  43:31

So you are have a screening level that seems to be above and beyond you can point to a couple of things that that are actual differentiators. They're not superlatives, like we have the most rigorous screening testing is we can say all of our donors are US residents, we can say that every single one of our donors gets this MMPI test, we can say that we check all of their documentation. Do you have any other assurances for making sure that they're not coerced, though? So imagine the MMPI helps with that. And if there are US residents, we know they're not coming from other countries. But trafficking can still happen in the United States. Do you have any other assurances for for knowing that this person wasn't brought in by a pimp or an abusive partner or some other organized crime person,

Diana Thomas  44:24

We have a an official human trafficking protocol. Every dollar that comes in and is given a cup to urinate in, is tall to put a red.on The cup if they're being coerced to come in? Yeah, Firdous and Australia just did a modern human trafficking protocol for their egg bank for their clinic. So people are starting to come around to seeing that you have to mitigate it somehow.

Griffin Jones  44:50

So you take them away. Do you take them away from whoever they came in? I noticed when I went into the labor and delivery ward early or this summer that I was in, they took my wife first. And I hung out in the waiting room and then and then they came and got me and there's Are you safe? You know, where you brought here on your own? Do you feel safe to go home? Do you know all of these sorts of things? And so how do you? How do you sort of coach the woman on what the red dot means?

Diana Thomas  45:23

We actually bring them in the back away from the, if there's anybody with them, that we discussed this in the back the nurses and the doctors do, when they're doing their ultrasounds, and they're taking their urine sample, if anyone were to say, I am not comfortable going home with him, or something's wrong, we will take them into the back of the building and call the police. And, you know, that's all we can do, really. But we've never had that happen. And I've gone through at least $30,000 in my life. But you know, we also do reimbursement sheets, so we know where they work, we know what their income is, when I have somebody come in and says, I need to pay next month's rent, it's a no go. That's that, to me, is taking advantage of economic vulnerability.

Griffin Jones  46:13

Which your standards of course, are higher, which I think is good. By the way, Dan, I think that's ethical. That so because you could argue that's a form of economic coercion, like, is she really consenting to donate her eggs, if she absolutely has to feed her firstborn, or if she has to make rent or any number of things pay off a debt that's going to send her in a bankruptcy. And so you're you're checking for this and where I just can't believe that's the case in many of these other countries. And, and, and in many of these other countries, that the threat of what living to paycheck to paycheck actually means is greater than it is here. And I'm not saying it isn't, it isn't a big threat to live paycheck to paycheck here. But one, people do it more in other countries and to what it actually means is that you don't eat. Yeah, I lived in Bolivia, I lived in Bolivia in 2014 and 2015. And poverty in Bolivia means that you don't get you don't put food on the table that night. And and so if there aren't different social safety nets, and so simply by virtue of having donors from other countries, you simply couldn't have that same level of assurance of what we might call economic coercion, because they do have that economic threat. It is more present. And it's more dangerous. And generally speaking. 

Diana Thomas  47:52

Well, true. And I you know, I see your point, I think that sometimes I hear the argument that that we do it here in the US to the point is, I think that's a red herring and you hit it right on the head. The Social Network is here to rescue people who do fall into those pits. I mean, if she had no food, could she go to a homeless shelter? Could she? Are there leaves? You know, she educated she? Could she get another job? Does she have legal remedies for if she was abused here, or she felt she was coerced? It's so different. When people have support systems built into our social network, as you saying,

Griffin Jones  48:30

Yeah, I don't want to belabor the point. But I think a couple of people might listen to say, No, it is still bad here. And as it can be bad here at different points. I'm telling you, it's nothing like what it is in these other countries. I'm telling you, you're poor here means that there you're you're living in public housing, and it's rough and appliances aren't working. And sometimes utilities aren't working and, and there's there's lots of crime and all of those things are serious dangers. What poor means in Bolivia is that is a dirt floor with a tin roof. And you there is no there's no there's no public transit that you can even just get get a bus pass for there's no soup kitchens, there's no there's no homeless shelters, at least in the rural areas. And so, you know, this is the case and a lot of different points. So I won't I won't belabor that anymore, but I know somebody's probably thinking, Oh, no, it's still just is but I'm telling you, it isn't. And, and so Okay, so you've you've, you have these checks and balances in place. And thank goodness, no one has had to use the red dot but you're taking the women away to make sure that that they're not being trafficked. out what let's talk a little bit. We talked about what egg banks can do. We talked about what what, what you're doing. Let's maybe talk a little bit about what else clinics can be doing because and you alluded to this checklist, which I think people should go to your website To download, we will have it on the page for this episode, we will link to it in the email that we send the episode out into. And, and people should go because every CEO is going to want their team to look at this, every lab director is going to want to look at it every practice owner is going to want to look at it. But let's talk about more about what what happens to clinics if they don't have these things in place and and what they can do to protect themselves from using human traffic DAGs.

Diana Thomas  50:35

Well, you know, I suppose just not using them at all, it's really the only way to be safe. How to How can you say that this cohorts probably okay, but this cohort isn't? I don't think you can do that. I don't think it's a matter of protecting yourself from traffic degas's from third world countries or developing countries. You can't change the whole social system and other countries. So the only way you can stop it is by not supporting it by paying for the eggs. You know, there's the the the intendant parents have no clue this was going on, you imagine telling your child you know, an 18 year sorry, you know, your donor was a prostitute. And there's her Baba records were blown up. So I can't tell you anything about her. You know, I mean, it's just the down, you know, this is not going to just stop with transferring eggs, it's going to be the pregnancy. So children born, the children who want contact with the donor, as time goes on, I think that there'll be a lot of losses if people are not more careful about this, and just don't engage in it. The FDA is catching on. And you know, I think it's a disservice to our own clientele, I mean, our own profession and our own, the people that we really want to help that I know that every clinic and Doctor really wants to help. Because they can't they can't double check any of that stuff. And they should stop pretending that they can. I don't know if I answered that question or not. It's it's kind of just goes on and on. You can't. There's no way to do it halfway. I guess.

Griffin Jones  52:21

You really can't use eggs from these other countries you have to use those from that are where there's there's one source where it's one country, are there other countries beyond the US that you feel are safe. You mentioned that sometimes us Canadian citizens said the US Canada or their other countries were okay. If if donors are coming from these areas that then that safe? Is it only developing countries that you're concerned about?

Diana Thomas  52:50

Now? I mean, I think you can work for donors in Australia and the UK, but the chances of doing that are pretty low because of their own laws around reimbursements. I I don't have any trouble recruiting donors, I have more donors, you know, I can I have 200 that are already all banked I could I could double that in six months if I wanted to. So when people say that I you know, we've got to do this, there just aren't enough donors. I just have to disagree and see, you're doing it because you're making a ton of money easily. And you don't know how to recruit donors. You don't you don't put three or four staff people to do this 100% of the time, which is what it takes. It takes a lot of time and effort, especially to get it right, legally. And worldwide, which is what we do. We follow laws and at least six different countries. So everything has to be really marked.

Griffin Jones  53:47

Donor sources is one of the areas of the checklist that you also have, you also have an accountability in which you list out specifically what that means with CDC with us. It means where were they sent prior to us that also kind of dovetails with the with the part of the checklist that you have for chain of custody, where we're monitoring who maintains the chain of custody who's who's handling who's doing the auditing, then you have an area for patient care and practice liabilities, the risks that they've been informed of the family limits, and then you also have section for donor care, talking about how to know if the donor has been stimulated more than recommended, etc. Tell us about some of these these other areas and what practices should be concerned about?

Diana Thomas  54:40

Yeah, I think, you know, again, it's been documented everywhere in many places, including the dissertation that when a donor is hyper stem, she comes back to the clinic banging on the door and they say tough your donations over a good luck go find go get better somewhere. So they're not cared for any Any repetitive egg donation over, you know that many repetitive egg donations has long term consequences for these women, the clinics, you know, they're, they can't verify the records, they can't verify the profiles, they can't verify the ID, all they do those who have eggs sitting in front of them. And they feel that well with the patient went there and and ordered them, what am I going to do, I just have to warm them and transfer them. But the fact is, when a doctor takes eggs and warms them and fertilizes them, and puts them back in a patient, he saw last chance to rectify a problem that will that could happen to that woman and that child, he's participating, he's condoning the whole process, if he transfers those embryos into a patient, he, they're not going to go and sue a broker or a pimp in some other country, they're going to sue the doctor here in the lab and the staff. It's you know, so it's, there are huge liabilities, I think, and they just haven't, it's kind of shown up yet, because it hasn't been around as, as commonly as it is now, very long. So we'll see what happens in the next six months to a year. And if the FDA is already tracking down the Ukrainian eggs, they're gonna be asking people and clinics when they do their audits, to find out to show them the chain of custody. For the FDA testing.

Griffin Jones  56:29

I'm gonna give you the final thought I want to conclude with my final thought, because you're the expert in this area where I can shed some useful advice to those listening is that if this were connected to your clinic, and in something big happens, it can be one of those irredeemable public relations, travesties. So you're talking about the human concern, our listeners should be deeply concerned with the human concern, I'm sharing the business concern here. On top of that, the human concern comes first. But I'm sharing the business concern on top of that, that many of you are CEOs that are listening, and many of you are practice owners. But whether you're a practice owner of a six doc group in, in a city here, or whether you are the CEO of a network that is getting ready to be bought by another network, or to buy another network or to go public, imagine something like this coming out from the New York Times, that comes back to your clinic, this is something that you absolutely have to look into recommend you start by going and reading through the checklist, going to The World Egg and Sperm Bank site reaching out to Diana to find out more about this, but you absolutely have to look into it. Because if something like there was a an article that came out last year from the New York Times, they were surrogates, now they must raise children. And it talks about, you know, coercion, and human trafficking and surrogacy in Cambodia. But if an article like that comes out and links someone to your clinic, oh, and by the way, it was these clinics in the United States, these networks that purchased these types of eggs, that is a really bad thing to happen, especially if you're a mission driven organization, many of these fertility clinic networks, market themselves on the missions that they're building themselves toward, and that would betray any core values that, that they're open to build their, their brand. And upon and the the, I'm looking at the article that you talked about previously, Dinah, where it's police arrest members of a baby trafficking ring on Crete, Greece, if any of this is is linked back to your clinic, it's really bad. Again, the human concern comes first. But that's the business public relations concern. I strongly recommend everyone to go to your website and read this checklist. Again, we're gonna link to it in the show notes. We're gonna link to it on the show page, we're gonna link to it in the email that goes out it will be on The World Egg and Sperm Bank's website. And if you still need more help getting in touch with with Diana and finding those resources, I will I will connect you personally. But Diana, now, please. I want to leave it to you to conclude.

Diana Thomas  59:36

Well, I you know, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm actually really trying to partner with clinics to help them out. So they aren't in that situation with this education. But there's also another piece you know, the the US has ratified the UN Human Trafficking protocol. And in it there's also punishment that comes along with being arrested and convicted including repatriation of every Hanna you made from that Trafficking Act. So there is also a financial piece to this for networks, global networks I so I really hope people are listening. It's it's something we can reverse. I think we all love our patients who really want to take care of our patients and give them healthy babies. So we have to be aware of these things to move forward.

Griffin Jones  1:00:23

Thank you very much for coming on the podcast and and sharing light on this topic. I look forward to hearing more about the follow ups and about the people that reach out to you afterward. Thanks for coming on the inside reproductive health podcast.

Diana Thomas  1:00:38

Thanks for the opportunity.

Sponsor  1:00:40

This episode was made possible by our feature sponsor The World Egg and Sperm Bank, head over to www.theworldeggandspermbank.com/protect and download their free due diligence checklist to ensure that your program only sells eggs from donors that have been safely and ethically protected. That's theworldeggandspermbank.com/protect. Today's episode is paid content from our future sponsor who helps inside reproductive health to deliver information for free to you. Here the advertiser has editorial control. Feature sponsorship is not an endorsement and does not necessarily reflect the views of Inside Reproductive Health.

144 More Dangerous Than Overturning Roe? The IVF Legislation You Really Need to Watch, According to Atty. Igor Brusil

Griffin hosts embryologist-turned-attorney, Igor Brusil, to discuss what he, as an attorney, believes is a bigger threat to the fertility space than the overturn of Roe v. Wade, and why. What implications could changing donor privacy laws have on your practice-even if you don’t practice in the state that overturns them? Could they extend beyond donor rights and result in an inspection of your business? Listen to hear one specialist’s opinion on Inside Reproductive Health with Griffin Jones.

Listen to hear:

  • Who is advocating for the release of donor information, including medical history.

  • What laws, changing in states like Colorado, could impact your practice (even if it is not in the same state).

  • Griffin press on whether Roe v. Wade has a larger potential to damage the fertility space than changing donor privacy laws.

  • Griffin question why no one is protecting the rights of the donors.

  • Igor’s opinion on what you, as a practitioner, can do to protect yourself and your business.

139: Two REIs Debate OB/GYNs’ IVF Capabilities with Dr. Brauer & Dr. Arredondo

Dr. Anate Brauer (REI, co-founder and IVF Director of Shady Grove Fertility’s New York Region) and Dr. Francisco (Paco) Arredondo (Chief Medical Officer and founder of Pozitivf and author of MedikalPreneur) hash out their agreements, and disagreements, on the upskilling of OBGYNs in the fertility space

Listen to the full episode to hear:.

  • Dr. Anate Brauer argue that years of training and experience as an REI do not equal OBGYN general practice upskilling, which compromises patient care and increases risk.

  • Dr. Francisco Arredondo state that it is taking place already, the need for providers far exceeds supply, and that OBGYNs are capable (and successful), if properly trained.

  • Dr. Brauer and Dr. Arredondo agree on where APPs can offload the burden of REIs. 

  • Griffin question whether upskilling OBGYNs to handle IVF will create another chasm in the healthcare system.

  • Griffin push back that a solution needs to be identified, (after years of overpromising and underdelivering on the increase of graduating REIs), as they are handcuffed by fellowships and educational institutions. 

Dr. Anate Brauer’s Information: 

Website: https://www.shadygrovefertility.com/locations/new-york/manhattan-fertility-center/

Dr. Francisco Arredondo ’s Information:

LinkedIN: linkedin.com/in/fertilitysanantoniotexas

Website: www.medikalpreneur.com


[00:00:52] Griffin Jones: Can OBGYN do IVF retrievals? Are you good with that? Are you okay with that? You disagree. You the inside reproductive health audience disagree on if non REI fellowship trained OB GYN can do IVF egg retrievals or not. This is one of the things that we talk about today with my guests, Dr. Anate Brauer and Dr. Francisco Arredondo. We try to get down to the exact point that they disagree on and really zoom in on what they think OB-GYNs, that are not REI fellowship training, can do and can't do. There's a whole bunch of things that pile into this access to care argument, and I try to piece them out and I try to elucidate.

Okay. What's the exact point that you disagree? And I think we found that as well as we talk about the duopoly, the duopoly of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, we talk about the shortage of embryologists is that need even greater of a bottle of the bottle neck. Then the shortage of REI is we talk about expanding fellowship programs, which is never gonna friggin happen from my vantage point.

Maybe I'm being cynical, but Dr. Brauer promises to get me somebody that can walk us through that in a podcast episode. And I think these are two of the people to do it. This is a bit of a continuation from the debate that I have with Dr. John Storment and Tracy Keen, the CEO of Mater Fertility, both Dr. Brauer and Dr. Arredondo had listened to that episode as well as some others and felt that they had something to offer. And I think they both did have something to offer Dr. Brauer's of course, with Shady Grove Fertility in New York, she's fellowship trained from Cornell, which a various med fellowship program.

And Dr. Arredondo is the Medikalpreneur is going to be on a different episode to talk about that there are initiatives that he was involved in, including the foundation that he talks about in this episode that I didn't even know at the time of booking. I also didn't know that he sits on the board for Mate Fertility.

And so I feel that should be disclosed. It wasn't disclosed in the conversation. And so I'm disclosing that here, but I feel that both parties really spoke what they truly belief and and they both make strong cases for what they believe in. The shout out for today's episode is going to go to Dr. Matt Retzloff.

I'm sorry, friend. I probably butchered the study that you were recommending that would give us better data on making decisions about the quality of care. So, Dr. Retzloff, if you want to come on the show and spend the entire time talking about what you recommend. I promise to let you to do justice for you there.

So I can't make this debate. I'm not a clinician. We have two good clinicians on here who disagree, you analyze their motives. You do all the psychological analysis that you want, but you tell me, who do you agree with? Who do you think is right in this context and what are we missing? If anything, enjoy this discussion with Dr. Anate Brauer and Dr. Francisco Arredondo.

Dr. Arredondo Francisco welcome back to Inside Reproductive Health, Dr. Brauer Anate welcome to inside reproductive health. 

[00:04:21] Dr. Anate Brauer: Thank you so much for having me. 

[00:04:23] Griffin Jones: Dr. Arredondo has been on twice before. And part of the reason why you have Dr. Brauer is because I have had probably four or five people from Shady Grove on, at this point, and I'm going to be accused of playing favorites, but now I'm going to be accused of playing favorites with Paco too, because this is his third time on the show.

He's going to come back on for a fourth because he's got a new book, medical preneur that once I get finished reading that he and I are gonna go over that, but you're both on, because you each had some points of view on an earlier episode, a couple earlier episodes that I've done. One started off with mate fertility and that got people talking.

Then we had the CEO of made fertility on to talk with Dr. John Storment even before that episode aired. And that you shared with me that you had concerns about what the REI about taking things out of the REI preview and what that means Paco, you had points after that came out where you felt like that there needed to be a physician arguing for the side of upskilling or training OB-GYNs outside of fellowship, but let's start with your concerns not. And just, what was the concern that you had when you listened to that first episode, or just in general about the issue? 

[00:05:43] Dr. Anate Brauer: Sure. So I think my background is I trained at Cornell, which I realize is in New York City, where there are 22 other IVF centers and there is a lot of access to care.

So I understand that we're coming at this from different perspectives, but my fellowship director always said to us when the time I was a first-year fellows. Our field of medicine, more than any other field of medicine has the potential to change society. As we know it right. For better or for worse. And I think that that comes with huge responsibility and liability.

And so it's a big undertaking. And one of the hardest things we'll talk about kind of bottlenecks to access because that's a big part of this discussion. But one of the hardest things I do is counsel patients not just do procedures, but also counsel patients on very complicated endocrine issues that have to do with competing, brokering failures and other things that we'll get into.

And I don't feel like I would be equipped. To treat the patient with the level that they should be treated. If I didn't have the training that I had. So it does concern me this idea of standardization of pair as a CEO of, of Mate stated that said that those words multiple times because each case is individual and all of the training that we've received and experience that we've had, I think helps us get that individual patient to their goal of competing safely.

And so that's my concern here in New York, by the way, what prompted my conversations about this and actually will prompted my interest in being on the start QA committee, which I'm now on, is seeing chart after chart of complications of IVF cycle overseen by general OB GYN who have not been properly trained, who are working for some of these companies that are looking now to scale very quickly.

And so that's what kind of prompted this concern in me. So there you have it. 

[00:07:53] Griffin Jones: Okay. I'm going to come back that I took a couple notes on two different points. You made one about fellows and then another about the complications that you seen, but Paco, when you reached out to me and just said, there needs to be a doctor arguing.

There needs to be an REI arguing for the case of training OB-GYNs outside of fellowship. What did you mean by that? And if I'm paraphrasing correctly. 

[00:08:14] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Sure. No, no. Yes. I thank you once more for having us and thank you to, and not to be willing to do mental gymnastics here. So I would like to set three things straight before we enter into any debate in one of them is that debates in my view are not to be won or lost.

The baits are to be learned from that's the first thing I want to state. The second one is that if we agree in the context here, that we believe both sides, that human reproduction is a universal, right? That's the other thing that I want to set as a context, because everything else evolves from there.

And the third thing is that there is a difference between clinical medicine and health policy that we asked physicians at the clinical level. We use sometimes not always created at the same, and there are very different interests in individual care versus health policy. And when we have 90% of the needs of the fertility unmet in this country then is when I do argue that we have to think of different models of providing care and among them, we have to explore the possibility to utilize every one a was at the top of our licenses.

So that's basically what I meant. And I would start by saying that it is not my intention ever to replace REI's we don't be ever, but we have to learn from other places, even within our specialty, let's go to fetal maternal medicine, the fetal maternal medicine, which are high-risk deliveries and high-risk pregnancy.

Those guys do not do one single delivery. All of the deliveries are done by OB GYN. They basically handle themselves at the top of the license by managing different pregnancies, recommending guidelines, recommender, and course of actions, and are executed by OB GYNS. And it's the sociologist, the only way they run five or so at the same time is by having extensors like CRNAs radiologist.

They don't do every single x-ray. In fact, they just sit and read the x-rays that the technicians and other people run healthcare. Otherwise. If we have a potential market of 3 million IVF cycles in the United States, and we are currently doing 300 cycles. Even if you crank the production of REI, we will never have all the REI is doing every single egg retrieval that is out there.

So my argument is, and this is the argument of our nonprofit, which is called universities to train people, to do other tasks that physicians are doing, or nurses are doing that can be done by different people at the top of the license that is there. 

[00:11:54] Griffin Jones: I want to let Dr. Brauer and analyze that in a moment.

I want you to start though Paco with what is the limit of what the REI can do? So if you already, I needs to practice at the top of their license. What is the limit to what can be done outside of fellowship training? 

[00:12:12] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Yeah, so I think I would approach it gradually. The other way it is, there is no question that an OB GYN and a nurse practitioner or a PA with good guidelines should be able to do every single diagnostic step of the fertility patients.

Number two. I think that doing an egg retrieval. For example, I would not give it to a nurse practitioner or physician assistant because they are not capable of resolving a complication bleeding, et cetera, but an OB GYN absolutely can do an accurate very well. There is no reason why an OB GYN can let's put it this way in the last week I spoke with probably 20 different fellows that our fellows out there that are coming out doing 10 egg retrievals in their whole fellowship that it's still to this day, they are reproductive endocrinologists that come out of fellowship without with zero embryo transfers, zero embryo transfers 

[00:13:36] Dr. Anate Brauer: This is an issue write that down Griffin, because that's something that should definitely be touched upon regarding fellowship program.

[00:13:43] Griffin Jones: So I am writing that down. I want you to continue Paco with so every step of the diagnostic process OB-GYNs can do egg retrievals.

What else?

[00:13:52] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Currently we're doing IUI is playing IUIs in the OB GYN office. And I think that there's no reason why they will not be able to do IUI and again, all under the supervision of a fertility specialist. Now you will have control of, or a guide, several OB GYN and there is a difference between what we call improvement in quality and innovation, because the requirements for improving quality are exactly the opposite to innovation quality requires consistency, repetition, precision standardization, because quality, the enemy of quality is variability. So that is what is required for improving quality. However, for innovation, you actually required the opposite. You require failure variation and serendipity. So we have to be able to dance this delicate dance between improving quality and innovating in healthcare.

And yes, how I see the market right now, or fertility taking certain steps imply that we will take some breaths. But not taking a risk right now, you will imply that will never satisfy the demand. 

[00:15:37] Griffin Jones: So before we go improving the, before we go innovating, now, I want to see in this game of, of blackjack, let's call it and that where we're hitting you one after another, at first OB GYN is doing every step of the diagnostic process, then doing egg retrievals, then doing IUI.

Do you disagree with any of that? 

[00:15:55] Dr. Anate Brauer: I think in general, all of these access conversations are glossing over one major issue, right? The issue with access does not just come down to how many RAs are graduating every year. There are other major roadblocks to access. So the three issues that I see with access are costs and affordability.

Even more than our eyes embryologists. Okay. And then REI is for us at SGS our biggest issue as we're expanding in various markets is not necessarily finding doctors to put into the clinic. It's even more so finding embryologists right. Takes about two to three years to train a good embryologist, to do biopsies and egg set cetera.

So all of these conversations are revolving around how do we get more providers? Did you retrievals to get more new patients in the door? But there's also roadblocks on the other end of that. I'll talk about some of the ways that we are trying to address from those, some of those robots within our organization and why I wish other people would be doing the same work.

I'm happy to talk about that. But one of my that, for example, when you were interviewing the Mate CEO that you were talking about access and costs, they don't take insurance. I have a huge, huge issue with that. And so I think we can not only talk about providers, if you don't talk about whats our solution for costs and embryologist, and a lot of the solutions for cost is well higher general OBGNYs, or would you want it?

And then you don't have to pay them as much as you do an REI by the way, some of my best friends in life are general OB GYN who are unbelievable, amazing what they do. And so none of this discussion in any way, a ding on being a general OBGYN. I also think we should look at our other fields in our space.

So I know some amazing generalists that are unbelievable surgeons. That doesn't mean that they can become GYN, oncologists. And so I think we should have a very clear discussion on what we need to do to expand more trained REI in this country and not only to roll over OBGYN, but also the role of APP.

For example, I do most of my own scans which I know sounds a little archaic, but that's how I was trained. And I'm in New York and my patients want to see me and I liked him the ultrasounds, and I think the more ultrasounds is even better, your retrievals. But I do think there's a role for APPs is, are advanced practice providers to do ultrasound, to do IUI, even to manage IUI cycles.

It doesn't even necessarily have to be a general overview. And I personally do not feel comfortable with the general do and doing retrievals unless they've done thousands and thousands of retrievals or unless it's an REIs physically on site. The CEO has made with saying, oh, we have five REI's on the board who are there by telemedicine.

She also didn't mention who these people are, but I don't know what REI that I know would feel comfortable with the liability of being on a video, walking in GYN, through a complicated egg retrieval, and some that has fibroids, maybe someone that needs an abdominal retrieval, it SDF. We have a policy that if someone requires an abdominal retrieval because of body habitus or anatomy or fibroids, there has to be two MDs on site to do that together in the, or so yes, 99% of retrievals are easy, but when they're hard, they're really hard.

You can be one millimeter away from the illiac I mean, I will not feel comfortable with an OB GYN handling case like that unless I was in the room with them. 

[00:19:22] Griffin Jones: Okay. 

[00:19:23] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: You will know those hard retrievals in advance. Obviously you will not have scheduled them.

[00:19:28] Dr. Anate Brauer: Not if I'm not scanning them.

[00:19:30] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Huh? 

[00:19:31] Dr. Anate Brauer: Not if I'm not doing the ultrasound.

Right. 

[00:19:34] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Do you think that an OB GYN will not affect the note by an ultrasound? A fibroid? I mean, I think that the OB GYN are capable of doing that and much more surgery, sometimes more complicated than, than I realized, but that is a debate that we can have, but regarding the issue of REI and the access of costs, I think it is very clear that the lack of production of REI is related to the lack of decrease of cost of idea.

We actually have very high IVF costs because we don't have enough supply. And if you think about any other industry, even in healthcare. Braces, I remember when I grew up only the rich people have raised raises a lot of other plastic surgery, every single one of those procedures has been going down in price.

The microwave was $600. Now you buy for 30. The only thing that has going up is the IVF cost. And it's not only because of the physicians. It is because there is a duopoly on the pharmaceutical industry. There is other reasons that there is no competition, but if there is in now with the consolidation of private equity, it actually will have even less competition that will not be quizzed the price of access.

So my point is that the correlation of access to cost is directly correlated with the lack of providers. 

[00:21:13] Dr. Anate Brauer: Right. So how do we increase that? Right. So for example, we, so I'm part of Shady Grove Fertility, which is a part of a larger organization US fertility, we train, we graduate about six fellows a year. So we now run the NH fellowship program, the University of Colorado's program, and the University of South Florida.

[00:21:33] Griffin Jones: But how many of those are new fellowships? And not like the University of Colorado was acquired by us. Jeff Jones was acquired by us. Jeff, not how many of them are new? 

[00:21:42] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: We need hundreds.

[00:21:44] Dr. Anate Brauer: Right. But hold on a second. Let me just finish what I'm saying. Right? So we support those fellowship programs. We train those fellows, we fund those fellows.

Which I don't see any other non-academic program doing or offering to do. We would love to open more fellowships. For example, I'm here at STF, New York with my partner Tomer singer, who was the director of the residency director at Lenox hill for almost 15 years. Right. So we would love to do that. The problem is there are many hoops and ACG requirements. You're required you to be affiliated with an academic center, which for us in New York, everyone's already taken up. Everyone already has their own fellowship program and they don't want the competition, which is a whole other conversation. It's impossible as an REI and New York city to even get hospital privileges because they don't want to give you privileges because they don't want you competing with them, which is a whole other problem that you really be on the cover of the New York time.

But that's the problem we want to train fellows. We do. I can't speak for other organizations like CCRM or Kindbody or anybody else. We want to train fellows. We are training fellows. We are training embryologist since we took over the Jones' program, we're expanding that training program. But these are the things that we need to be focusing on rather than taking shortcuts and hiring OB GYN and train them to do, what would we do.

[00:23:04] Griffin Jones: But everybody's been saying that for years now, and it still hasn't happened. We're still not adding more of them. 

[00:23:10] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: I don't think that it's taking shortcuts. It's thinking out of the box to re think the model because the truth is being very realistic. If we are currently doing 300,000 IVF cycles with 1500 IVF doctors, and we have required 3 million cycles in the country, when are we going to produce another 10,000 REI?

 We want. We want. Period. I mean, we have to be realistic.

[00:23:45] Dr. Anate Brauer: Right. I think the main issue is that the fellowship programs are siloed within academic programs who have no interest in expanding or working with private practices to expand fellowships because they're perfectly comfortable. In the situation that they're in.

Right. And so that's a major discussion that needs to happen. And I'm still asking the embryology question because my main limit to increasing my cycle number is how many embryologists do I have in my lab? And to me, it's much harder finding embryologists than it is to find an REI. 

[00:24:19] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: And actually in that I would say Griffin to schedule a talk with Tony Anderson.

Who is our lab director and the main person. He has IVF Academy of IVF of USA and that he is going to be incorporated into our University. And basically he presented at the Pacific that after doing a two month training. The outcome is exactly the same as if somebody that has more than one year doing an exam.

He prove it. He has the data is not data that is just mentioned is data, solid data. So we are actually changing the way the training is happening. There is a hybrid training online, and then there is in-person with actual cases. And I think that the academy can produce very good embryologists in approximately four months with all the training.

Well, I'm not an embryologist and this is what my embryologists are saying. 

[00:25:27] Dr. Anate Brauer: You should ask Michael Tucker and Jim Brown, and maybe they can debate each other. 

[00:25:32] Griffin Jones: My job as moderators did keep this a little bit boring by preventing the 18 different topics from going, focusing on one. So I'm going to try and do that.

I do want to come back to Dr. Brauer's point about embryologists later because Dr. Storment afterwards texted me and said, I wish that I had brought that up to although now no, I'm going to save my tangential thought for when we come back to that, I want to, and the duopoly of pharmacies and the fellowship programs, I want to come back to still what you are comfortable with the OB GYN being trained to do not.

And it sounds like, okay, they can do retrievals if an REI is physically in the room and. 

[00:26:13] Dr. Anate Brauer: Yeah. And then that defeats the purpose, right? Because I'm still physically in the room. I still have to physically be in there. They will do the retrieval.

[00:26:23] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: I personally disagree that you don't require a REI to be pressing down the hall? Not even, I mean, not even there because an OB GYN in a simple case, which is what we want to select to give to them. They have the capacity to open that patient. They have the capacity to the tech. When the patient is bleeding, they have the capacity to suture a cervical artery probably better than us.

So now they have not done it. And as I mentioned, there are currently a lot of our REI colleagues when they started practicing, they have done less than 10 equity retrievals. That's what it is in. we are naive and we don't think that that is happening, that we were learning on the train. 

[00:27:09] Griffin Jones: Anate are you not satisfied that an OB GYN could address the complications?  

[00:27:15] Dr. Anate Brauer: I fully again, like many of my friends who were generalists are probably better surgeons than I am I guess I don't understand what the, the kind of, it's almost a perseveration of OB GYN, OB GYN, up-scaling OBGYN and why is that? 

[00:27:31] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Because we have 90% of the market without cover. We have 90% of the market that is not covered. 

[00:27:38] Dr. Anate Brauer: Okay, so let's talk.

Why are they not covered? 

[00:27:41] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Because A, lack of access financially, B lack of go live, go of competition because we don't produce and offer REIs and our boards have for 20 years spoke with both of them. Saying that they wouldn't increase access and they have not done it because we have not produced more REIs because there is access to care.

Like there are certain areas that are in rural areas that they want to solve right now. Their practice in private equity will not buy it because, oh, it doesn't provide a lot of revenue there. So those are in insurance coverage is another one and that it is not mandatory. So all those are reasons.

But the main reason, if you look at any healthcare issue is a supply driven market. The more suppliers you have, the bigger the market will be there and we are not supply-driven. 

[00:28:43] Dr. Anate Brauer: So I just want to take those points one at a time. Right? So. And put the, my argument aside for a second, because one let's, let's talk about cost, for example, that's the first thing you mentioned.

So the main issue with costs is lack of insurance coverage. Right? If everyone had insurance coverage, everyone would have access. Is that accurate?

Right? So that's that we should be focusing on. If the, 

[00:29:16] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: if the, if the, if the insurance is given to everybody, not only the ones that work, then it will be covered. So if they don't see universal health care coverage, yes. 

[00:29:25] Dr. Anate Brauer: Your premises I'm from Israel. Originally, everyone has coverage and everyone has IVF pilots.

But 

[00:29:30] Griffin Jones: how does that supply, how does that solve your supply and demand issue pocket? If, if, if, if we're, if, if we're only serving a quarter of the population are actually not a quarter, a fraction of the population and, and that's, that's covered and we still have eight and 10 week wait lists. How does, how does ensuring more people increase access?

[00:29:55] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: I don't think so because you have much more demand, but you don't have for supplies. 

[00:30:01] Dr. Anate Brauer: Okay, so then let's talk about why are there waitlist? So we have, we have, I don't know, 40 something offices now in all different regions, we follow our waitlist very closely. We're not in any, , we're in Colorado, Colorado spring.

We're not, , we're not in the Midwest. So I have friends in Nebraska. I think she has a wait list of two or three months or something like that, which they can get their initial workup done with her OB GYN. And by the time they get to her, , I think COVID has changed a lot. We can do a lot of virtual consults to me.

When, when I talk about access, someone's not going to open you to financially support IVF labs, to be able to argue, to put an embryologist that two minimum, two embryologists there could you need witnessing and all the staff that you need to staff a, an ASC, et cetera. You may have an ASC in a major city and you may have kind of satellite monitoring.

Stations, if you will. And if I train some on whether it's an ultrasonographer or a PA, it doesn't have to be a general OB GYN is my point. If I train a PA to do all the monitoring there, I think I have more than enough time to review those cycles. So that's why I don't know what, why specifically we're talking about the way to solve the access to care issue is trained more overdue in because if I had someone doing monitoring and then coming for me to do retrievals and my partners to do retrievals and I can sit there and do virtual consults all day long, I don't see why, why this is an issue.

I don't 

[00:31:27] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: think that we can, we can, we can not do 2.7 million ed retreat. We can't 1500 people cannot do 2.7 million egg retrievals it's on reasonable is up. It's not possible. I do agree with you a hundred percent. We open a satellite, a hundred percent run by a PA a hundred percent. She saw the patients she's monitored.

She sent them, we do the egg retrieval. We do the transfer could not agree with you more. And that I think that we can set it up here as the basis for agreement that we can develop satellites where everything else. And we can start as a point of view to start training those people, to do the satellites.

Now there's going to be a point that those satellites are going to saturate the egg retrieval bottleneck that will occur, and then we can discuss the next step. But I think that as a first step, we need to train people that. It's comfortable doing all the monitoring, all the counseling and tweaking the medication during the stimulation.

So we agreed that they can do the diagnosis. They can do some basic, 

[00:32:49] Dr. Anate Brauer: oh, I said, I set 

[00:32:50] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: a PA or nurse practitioner or a generalist. It's okay. It's cheaper. Or is less expensive if you use a RPA, but now for an country. I certainly will allow. In fact, there are plenty of OB GYN out there, general OB GYN that are doing that for, 

[00:33:08] Dr. Anate Brauer: with as we speak.

Yes. And I have managed their complications.

[00:33:16] Dr. Francisco Arredondo:

[00:33:16] Dr. Anate Brauer: have, I'm not saying there aren't out there and , we've all had complications. 

[00:33:21] Griffin Jones: Did they appear to be disproportionate to you or not? Did they do, does it appear anecdotally, do you, does it seem that you're seeing more complications from 

[00:33:31] Dr. Anate Brauer: hyperstimulation syndrome? Absolutely because they haven't been trained and.

Hundreds of thousands of simulation cycles. And by the way, I totally agree with you Paco. I was lucky enough to train at Cornell where by the time I graduated, I saw more simulation cycles and most attending feat in a year. Right. So I understand which is another issue. Like there's fellowship programs out there that do 200 cycles a year, that's it?

And they have two fellows. They should not have two fellows because those fellows aren't getting clinically trained. I mean, that's a whole other discussion even needs to be 

[00:34:05] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: had. And that would be the second point of agreement, which is we agree that we can train all those people. The second to try to find common ground is that somehow we need to revisit how the people is being trained in fellowships, because we're putting a lot of emphasis of 18 months or 20 months in research when 99% of the people come out and do IVF, maybe we need to track.

So REI. The researchers 

[00:34:36] Dr. Anate Brauer: and the IVF. So 

[00:34:39] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: you'll have now two different tracks and you can produce in one year a good REI fellow in a, that is going to do IVF because by that year, they can do easily a hundred retrievals, easily 50 transfers and seeing their sheriff complications and they can go on. So that's another compromise that I have no problem doing.

But I think in, in, in basically that's one of the ideas or just university that we really need to create. And that's what we've made it a nonprofit, because we don't want to, anybody to mention that we're doing this for profit thing. We are doing this for the firm belief that we think that the United States.

Do not have the healthcare that they deserve at the level of fertility, we have 90% and we need to change that and how we do it, we can obviously have the debate and this, but we need. 

[00:35:43] Dr. Anate Brauer: Griffin the fellowship question and the training. So at SGF, we require any one onboarding. I only have to do two weeks, but we require six weeks out of fellowship and spend it in Rockville.

You're doing hundreds of cycles. Minimum a hundred transfers before you can do anything in any of our labs. And so I, I, , unfortunately some fellows need a mini fellowship. We haven't made a business out of it, but maybe we should, but that's, , 

[00:36:11] Griffin Jones: and answer to your question of why this issue is I w I'm not qualified to argue that it's the most present maybe that maybe dogs are done to is, are arguing that this is the most important thing that we can do.

I'm simply observing that it is one thing that we can do out of many reasons. And the reason why we stalemate in politics very often, we're trying to improve education while the teachers need to, the teachers need to do this while we can't do that until the parents do well. And then you, when you. Go from one issue to another, just nothing ends up getting done.

So it's okay. We take the issues that we have in front of us and try to unpack each of them. I'm definitely not solving the duopoly of the, of the pharmaceutical companies here. And the embryologist, I do want to talk to more, but it's also another issue. Could it be more important than this one that's arguable, but this at least that the number of fellowship programs in the country is another issue, but I'm not a bog.

And and, and, and they still, nobody's still suggested in a bog person for me to talk, to, to do an entire episode soup, to nuts of what it would take to build find me, someone who, somebody listening, find me, that 

[00:37:22] Dr. Anate Brauer: person find the same answer, but 

[00:37:25] Griffin Jones: what's happening right now is that there are people training, OB GYN, generalist, OB GYN.

It sounds like. We have some agreement on what they can do. Some disagreement on the level of oversight needed and the, and the likelihood of complications that come from retrievers. What about the diagnostic piece? And what about OB-GYNs doing IUI? 

[00:37:51] Dr. Anate Brauer: So I think so I would, I would, the first one talks about the diagnostic.

So is it Mitchell? And again, I am in New York city where I treat a very different kind of patient population. I very rarely see a bread and butter facilitation. By the time the patient is sitting in front of me, they've cycled the four other centers. And show up with their like binder of medical records.

And so I don't see kind of the bread and butter. I have a lot of friends who are generalists, who want to send patients to me and in the interim, they're kind of doing a workup. So I do feel like one thing that would definitely help is training is first of all, increasing REI education in general and OB GYN residency, right?

OB residency, four years, I spent a ton of time in antepartum learning all the MFM stuff. Do you want oncology that I, Cornell is a very, I also did my residency at Cornell, very surgical program. I, I went into ODU and to do, do an oncology and then swung the other lines of spectrum. But I spent so much time in OBGY/Onc.

I wanted to do REI and I spent three weeks in REI and this is someone who actually wants to do it. So you can imagine the resident that doesn't care. So the OB GYN is graduating programs right now. Residency programs really know very, very little about REI. So we have residents here rotate with us in New York all the time.

From various hospitals and, and the first step is to just teach them the basic workup. What does it take to make a baby? How do you talk to a patient about it almost from, as in flipping in normal uterus to implant normal ovaries with normal numbers of eggs and genetically competent eggs, right.

Just be at the conversations that the ingredients doing the workup, right. That automatically takes so much off of my plate. And so by the time they're coming to me, they're already kind of packaged up of, okay, here's the basic workup, also doing the preconceptual genetic testing so that they're all kind of set up.

So I'm totally comfortable with an OB GYN doing those sorts of things, then even comfortable with an OB GYN, managing IUI cycles. For example, as long as they're monitoring cycles, I'd actually rather have an OB-GYN working under. Stimulating patients and actually monitoring them than just randomly giving them.

Clomid like, it's candy. Like we see all the time. Right. And you don't even know how many follicles are growing and even an GYN or a PA or an MP doing an IUI at Cornell, which is very tightly managed. I mean, fellows can't even stand follicles that are over 13 millimeters, right? When I was a fellow, unless you were a senior fellow and very experienced and ultra down, but the NPS and the PAs would be the ones doing IUI.

So that's, that's very low risk. I have no problem with that. It's really, when it gets more into the, it's very important for me to counsel a patient on what IVFis, the pros and cons of it, the risks and benefits, the possible outcomes and complications, right? Because it's all about setting expectations.

And I feel like we know all the possible outcomes, genetic testing, which is becoming more and more complex. The pros and cons that are constantly changing every few months, we're learning more and more. And specifically when there's failures talking and counseling patients through that, we know with our eyes, what happens in the lab, most fellowship programs, you do spend time in the lab.

And so those things that take it does take a fellowship for them to learn all of those things, thin lining, but current implantation failure, we're current present the wealth, all of the things that we're still well versus taking it. So those are the cases that I want to manage. I feel comfortable with an OB-GYN managing a simulation cycle, but I also feel comfortable with a PA running through that dosing with me, which takes, , five seconds for me to do.

And I'm even profitable the PA doing the IUI. So that's why I don't, I don't think it even requires training general. I would do am. I think an REI can handle it. Doing more cases. If we, if we're set up in a more efficient way. I also think one thing that we haven't brought up here, which is huge for efficiency is AI, right?

The, we, we at us fertility are, have, are investing a lot of time and money and research dollars into exploring various ways that artificial intelligence can be used. I think one of the best ways it can be used is, and this is for everything from doing an ultrasound, like you can have an MNA, take an ultrasound probe, put it in the vagina and you get a read out of every follicle and what sizes objectives.

Cause there's always subjectivity when you're talking about measurement. So something is a little of that to extrapolating it, to. Dosing a patient's right. And algorithms of looking at hundreds of thousands of cycles and predicting even based on fire cycles that, that patient's done when you should trigger how you should trigger, et cetera, and also into the lab of grading embryos, et cetera.

So I think, I think where the investments should be is training more REI, which is complicated because that involves a bag and ACG made all of those things. We've got to find a way to do it. Training more embryology. And artificial intelligence to make our lives more efficient to solve our problem.

[00:43:09] Griffin Jones: Darn it. He will, he will buy the, it'll start a new one by the end of this podcast 

[00:43:14] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: at 99% of the things. I agree because I agree that we only as a OB GYN rotate one month and the issue is when they pressure you to take vacations in our, in every I in just one month or two months in the whole 48 months of of training, I do agree that artificial intelligence is the future.

And obviously there are already companies out there, like we were just mentioning and all that. I think the key difference, and we agree that we need to train REI perhaps in a more expedite manner. Or in two different tracks, we agree that we can utilize nurse practitioners, physician assistants in order to increase efficiency in the system.

All that I think the only difference that we have is that I feel strongly that a OB GYN can handle equity tremble. And obviously she does not. But in order to dive into that particular question, let's think of other examples within our industry , that you have birthing centers and you have delivery centers and in the birthing center, you're not going to send a patient with a previous C-section preeclampsia and diabetes to be delivered there.

No, you want to send this straightforward case that will have. Very unlikely, a reason to have a complication. And if that thing arrives, you have a system in place to send it to the delivering hospital, which is rare. So it is the same thing in fertility where you can put the simpler cases, especially those that are in rural areas in markets B's.

And C's where a train OB can do the retrofit. And we don't know what is going to be in the future because now in the future, you might get. You send the act to a place where they do. They send this sperm, they do the, the embryo, and now you send the embryo back to the place and anybody can do a number of transfer.

I mean, that could be a potential business model for the future, right? Where you do it. Richard was in one place. You freeze the egg, you freeze the sperm, you send it to a very concentrated laboratory. And you'll create the Ember and you'll send it back. And then you transferred the embryo that is possible.

And now you increase access 

[00:45:48] Griffin Jones: w one point that was given to me, and I want you to apply it on this Dr. Brown Dr. Matt Retzloffemailed me after one of the earlier episodes and says that the only way to really know is to the effectiveness and the safety is and if I'm paraphrasing your point, Dr. Retzloff, you can come on and do your own show.

But he, he was talking about, the only way to really know, is to do a randomized blinded trial of, of outcomes of safety. And because I'm not a clinician because I'm paraphrasing Dr. words, how would that work? How would we, would we really be able to compare the, the outcomes from a board certified.

An ecologist versus the training that's being 

[00:46:31] Dr. Anate Brauer: done, IRB will ever prove that study. And I don't really see patients signing up for that study personally. I wouldn't do that. So, I mean, I think it's, I still am having a hard time wrapping my brain around this conversation, even being a conversation and the word upskilling, which I had never heard that word before a year, 18 months ago, , 

[00:46:55] Griffin Jones: I adopted the word to distinguish it from fellowship training.

[00:46:59] Dr. Anate Brauer: I understand. 

[00:47:01] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Well,  what happened? What happens in any other country in the world, in Spain, which has been a leader of fertility for years, Spain and France in Eataly in any other place, there's no fellowship, they finished and they go through a certificate or they. And mentoring. I don't know if in Israel there is a fellowship, is there a fellowship in Israel, 

[00:47:28] Dr. Anate Brauer: but they're yes, but they're, they're also required to continue practicing general OB GYN and to take call because it's a, it's a socialized system.

So they see their patients after hours. They do new patient consults, like at 11:00 PM. 

[00:47:43] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: But in order to do an REI, do you have to go through a 

[00:47:45] Dr. Anate Brauer: fellowship? The practice? Yeah. I don't know if it's an official fellowship. You're definitely certified in fertility, all these things that you're mentioning.

They're still training programs and they're not six week training programs. I mean it's years of training. So, but at the end of the day, it's not a new fellowship program. Right. Did you believe that a really good general OBGYN should be take to be cutting out cancer. 

[00:48:10] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: But I would not compare, I would not compare an egg retrieval with the level of complexity of, of a surgery of cancer.

[00:48:18] Dr. Anate Brauer: The liability is similar. I mean, don't feel like our field has the highest liability pretty much at any field. 

[00:48:27] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: I don't think so. I disagree with that. The the premiums of REI are very low compared 

[00:48:33] Dr. Anate Brauer: to the 

[00:48:35] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: liability. That's how it's based. The liability. The liability is based on how likely are you to be sued.

And, and the premiums are fertility. They are very low, very low. I mean, compared to high risk OB, those are high. 

[00:48:49] Dr. Anate Brauer: I feel like what we do and the counseling we offer and the potential issues in the lab are extremely high liability. And so I personally would want to manage those liabilities myself rather than managing someone else's life.

[00:49:06] Griffin Jones: We can bring Dr. Katz on for a liability episode to examine that. But Paco, I want to put something on you because a lot of this conversation might be overlooking second and third order consequences with regard to access to care that come from training. OB GYN is like, I don't know what their overall workload and wait lists look like right now, but I don't think most OB-GYNs are sitting around waiting for new patients.

I think they have case loads and workloads that are pretty full, full. I could that it could be an assumption that needs to be tested, but either way I think it's one we were overlooking here. So if we solve for access to care with regard to fertility treatment, by bringing more OB GYN in to do some of the purview of the REI, then aren't we creating a shortage of care somewhere else in the OB GYN sphere?

[00:49:58] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: I, I don't know. The numbers on the OB GYN, how many are needed? I think that overall, if you look at the statistics by 2045, we are going to have like 70,000 a shortage of physicians in the United States. No matter what specialty you're talking about, because again, we're not producing enough. The, the medical schools are not producing enough physicians.

But I don't specifically to your Western. I, I don't know. We may. But the, the point here is that basically the big disagreement that we have is if an aria, if a OB GYN, after doing 50 or 100 supervised egg retrievals, if it is not capable of doing ed retrievals for an IVF clinic, my answer is yes, if that person and I don't know what the number is, 20 5100.

Which in certain clinics, that person can be trained two months after doing that, it can, that person do equity troubles for you. Absolutely. Absolutely can. In fact, they're are doing it right now. 

[00:51:09] Dr. Anate Brauer: Yeah, I guess my, my question goes back to Griffin. The point he just made, which I still don't see how this specific concept of upskilling solves our issues, because who's going to who we're going to take these jobs.

And we already see that happening. Our residents who GRA, who wanted to do REI, who didn't match for whatever reason. And now this is what they do. And then they get to put on Google that they're a fertility specialist and market themselves in that way. And now you're going to run into a shortage of generalists, which there's already a shortage of generalist generalists, definitely in this area.

I can barely get a patient in to see an OB GYN. Larger problem personally, I would rather train ABPs to do ultrasounds and help me with monitoring and make mission so that I can say my lane and do what I need to do and not take away from any other specialties who, who have their own issues with, with access.

And the other big concern I have is creating a two tier system of care, which we already have in this country clearly. Right. And we see it with cancer, for example, right? The main cancer centers. If you have cancer, you want to go to the best place flown, , you want to go to Texas MD Anderson, there's several big centers in the country you want to go to, you're not going to find it in small town USA.

I mean, I grew up in Memphis, Tennessee, so it's not like I grew up with, , so, so much access around me. Right. And so I do worry about. Giving one part of the population, kind of a water down version of what we do. And one part of a population, an elevated version of what we do the argument against that is, well, you're giving one part of the population, no option and other populations, the best option, but there's something to me just wrong about just because someone lives in a certain place or doesn't have enough money to afford the bad that, that you're potentially giving them a less safe experience.

And 

[00:53:17] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: we don't know if he's let's save. And I would say, we don't know if it let's save. And I would say that if we take a risk, we may fail, but if we don't take any risk, for sure, we will fail 

[00:53:28] Dr. Anate Brauer: to cover everybody. I'm happy to take risks, but I'd rather do it not with upselling of doing.

Well, what I mentioned before, I'm happy to send that set up satellite monitoring clinics, and 

[00:53:42] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: we have proven that that works and delivers the same 

[00:53:47] Dr. Anate Brauer: actual care, so that can work, but I still don't want to solve our problems. They 

[00:53:53] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: are randomized controlled trials where nurse practitioners do embryo transfers versus REI in England, randomized control trials.

Exactly the same pregnancy rate. Exactly the same pregnancy rate nurse practitioners in, in, in in England doing embryo transfers versus 

[00:54:14] Dr. Anate Brauer: res so, okay. So do you feel like we should even have any fellowship programs at all? I mean, everyone could be trained then what's the point of fellowship programs with everything can be, everyone can be trained to do.

Exactly the same thing. If you have any degree or any letter behind your, behind your name? Well, when 

[00:54:31] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: you go now, you're talking about medical education. That's a very important point. So the traditional medical education is based on pedagogy, which is training kids, the dietary pediatry, that's pregnant kids.

The new in, we don't learn like kids will learn by adults, which is unprovoked. And that is by doing things. And you can go and look at medical education. And the best way now is not to saturate people with theory and books and stuff, but it's to give a minimal basis and do things and do things and do things.

So that's why I would say that I will feel very comfortable if I give good basis to an OB GYN and I will train that OB GYN with supervision. To do 50 ed retrievals. It's an experienced surgeon already. I will feel as comfortable as a fellow that sometimes just finished 10 or 20 Avery Tribbles. He has a lot of information, but it does not have the experience or rather the ability to solve a problem.

I am talking specifically about this task. I'm not saying handling all the things I'm talking about. This. I feel very comfortable doing 

[00:55:54] Griffin Jones: it. So I want to let each of you conclude how you want it to, before we do them, I'm going to give you each an open thought to conclude on, but let's hit the embryologist question for a second, which I'm, this is completely anecdotal, but we have strategies based on clinics, different needs and capacities.

And I'm talking about my firm is a creative and biz-dev firm and it seems to me like clinicians hit their capacity first and then embryologist hits their capacity. It seems to me, this is very anecdotal that across the board is generally speaking as possible. The embryologist really, we hit that lab capacity some time after the COVID reopening sometime in September of 20 in the fall of 2020.

And so, but it, it seems to me like they're pretty neck and neck. Maybe the REI bottleneck is tighter, but they're, they're probably equal now, but why not solve the. Problem first Pacoor is, is this, is the embryologist, how is it not more pressing than the REI issue? 

[00:56:58] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Well, I think that you have to also look at AI, , not that umbrella just will be replaced, but there is a lot, there is the pipeline three to four companies looking at doing the umbrella in a box.

So, and the other thing is not only producing embryologist, but producing umbrella in a way that is lean managed. For example, right now everybody's checking their embryos and they want, and they three, and then they find who you really need to do that. 

[00:57:28] Dr. Anate Brauer: But when we 

[00:57:29] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: used to write one, three and five, now there's people not even checking them until day five or do put them in the editor scope and they just look at it that is working efficiently without changing the effectiveness.

So , one of the things here on, on, on lean management is that you have those two levels. And you have a cost. So how can we produce the same outcome with less cost or how can we remain with the same cost and improve the outcome? And here on the embryology question, you may pray, but actually they might not need as much in five years because AI may catch up with us.

Now you have a lot of people sitting there.

[00:58:16] Dr. Anate Brauer: I don't think I will catch up that bad. I mean, I think it's moving fast, but I still think we'll also always need embryology. Not for us in New York. I'll tell you that we are bottleneck has always been the lab. And so we really had to hire me. Now we have seven embryologists here, but. You really had to staff up and it's, and it's tough.

And so that was always our bottleneck and that was the bottleneck it for now. And that was the bottom line at NYU. I mean, everywhere I've been, that's been the bottleneck because in REI I can always add another new patient slot. I don't mind working hard and I don't mind, , seeing the patients and adding onto my schedule.

I have no issue with that, but the lab I, , in the lab is safety. It's I want my lab to be happy obviously, and feel like everything's being done safely. So I do think a lab is almost a better book, bigger, if not the same bottleneck 

[00:59:04] Griffin Jones: Anecdotally, I don't see REIs leaving REI. I'm seeing embryologist leave the lab, which is crazy to me because they're so in demand, we have embryologists applying for jobs at my firm.

I'm a biz dev and marketing firm because they just don't physically 

[00:59:18] Dr. Anate Brauer: want to be. I said, you send, send me their CV. 

[00:59:22] Griffin Jones: They don't want to be in the lab. They don't want to, they, these are 20 somethings that don't want to, they don't want to work long hours, one and two. They don't want to be in a physical location.

That's a 10 by 12 room for, for however long I'm going to let each, I'm going to let each of you conclude Dr. Arredondo, let's start with you. And then we'll go to Dr. Brower. How would you like to conclude your points? 

[00:59:47] Dr. Francisco Arredondo: Yeah, we'll start with your PaCo. Okay. Now, I mean, just basically I, we believe in, in democratization of IVF, we believe that every single human has the right to be reproduce.

And that is. International and universal human, right. We believe that we are falling short in the United States and that we have to think out of the box to rethink and reshape the model of how we practice medicine without ever compromising quality and without ever compromising safety. And we believe that we've been practicing fertility the same way for 40 years, and it is time to rethink how we do it.

We believe that part of that is to consider training physician assistants and nurse practitioners to do some of the tasks. And if we want to meet that demand of 3 million IVF cycles, we all to train other people to do egg retrievals. And we believe that OB GYN are a good candidate to do that.

[01:00:54] Griffin Jones: Now, how would you like to conclude? 

[01:00:56] Dr. Anate Brauer: So I agree with most of what Dr. Arrendondo has said today. I do think we have a major access problem. I also believe that repositioning is a human right, and everyone should have access to it. I don't think that the problem can be distilled and easily solved by one issue of training.

Would you answer, did you  do retrievals? I think as I mentioned before, the issues of access involve cost. Providers and embryologist, and the only way we're going to solve those problems is by increasing training programs, which is the long game. And in the short term, becoming more efficient through advanced practice providers and artificial intelligence and technology.

[01:01:35] Griffin Jones: You're both very good sports for coming on. You're both also advancing this discussion in the field by being able to do so in good faith. And so I appreciate both of you doing that and that hopefully we can use this as leverage to get somebody we're bringing ABOG to come in and do an episode about what it would be to accredit a REI fellowship program from soup to nuts.

Thank you, Dr. Arredondo. Thank you, Dr. Brauer for coming on Inside Reproductive Health.

90 - The Best of 2020

As we head into a new (and hopefully better) year, we wanted to take a look back on all the wonderful, inspiring guests we had on Inside Reproductive Health throughout the year. We talked about affordable care, mentoring new staff in the clinic and the lab. We learned about independent clinics and how they thrive despite heavy network competition, networks and how they continue to provide personalized care even after becoming publicly-owned. We talked about reducing physician burnout and increasing patient communication. And so much more.

On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, we highlighted your favorite episodes and compiled the best clips into one episode for you to enjoy as 2020 wraps up.

86 - Embryo Disposition: Implications and How to Protect Your Clinic, an interview with Igor Brusil

The disposing of embryos has long been a controversial topic in the world of IVF. Clinics can’t afford to keep embryos around when patients have stopped paying their bills. But the ethical and legal implications keep embryo disposition from being a simple decision. Plus, patients aren’t really properly educated on what the limitations of cryopreservation are and clinics aren’t always fully prepared with proper consents and contracts when the time comes to freeze embryos.

On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin spoke to Igor Brusil, attorney-at-law and per diem embryologist and legal counsel for the American College of Embryology in Houston, Texas. After working as an embryologist, Igor became interested in the ethical and legal implications of lab procedures, specifically embryo disposition. This led him to pursuing a legal degree and working as counsel for a variety of clients, but his focus remained in healthcare law, risk management, and professional liability.

He brought his unique experience to the show, sharing his thoughts on what clinics can do to protect themselves when it comes to the issue of embryo disposition.

81 - Ethical Implications of Physician Investment in Fertility-Related Businesses, an interview with Dr. Kevin Doody

Despite busy schedules taking care of patients and often running clinics themselves, it’s not uncommon to see doctors getting involved in ventures outside of their clinic’s four walls. From investing in pharmacies to serving as medical directors for new ART companies to starting software companies, REIs can be found doing a lot. No matter what the venture is, there is always the potential for creating a conflict of interest. So how do doctors draw the line? How are they able to ensure they are keeping the patient’s best interest at heart, and not just making decisions that are beneficial to the physician?

On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Dr. Kevin Doody. Dr. Doody founded Care Fertility in Fort Worth, Texas with his wife, Kathy, in 1989. He is also co-creator of Effortless IVF, which is a new ART technology treatment that uses INVOcells. He is also the Chief Scientist of Global Fertility and Genetics.

Together, Griffin and Dr. Doody talk about entrepreneurship in the fertility field and then, we dig into conflicts of interest in the field: what is acceptable and what isn’t.

79 - Uncovering the Pros and Cons of Mandated Fertility Coverage, An interview with Jay Palumbo

As of August 2020, less than half of the states in America have some form of mandated insurance coverage for fertility treatments. Some require coverage for IVF, some cover preservation, but more than 30 states still have no requirement for covering fertility treatments in any form. But why? Is coverage really beneficial on the business side of the fertility field?

On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin spoke with writer and women’s health advocate, Jennifer “Jay” Palumbo. Jay is currently the Chief Executive Officer at Wonder Woman Writer, LLC and is an avid women’s health advocate. From her award-willing blog “The Two Week Wait” to working at major fertility benefits companies, her experience has helped shape her mission to advocate for women’s health needs, especially when it comes to infertility.

In this episode, we uncover the pros and cons of mandated coverage from both the patient and the clinic side.

69 - COVID-19 and the 1st Trimester: What the ASPIRE Study Could Mean for Your Fertility Clinic, an interview with Dr. Eleni Jaswa and Dr. Marcelle Cedars

The first trimester of pregnancy is crucial. Organ development is taking place, the placenta is being developed, things that can affect the trajectory of the entire pregnancy, or the baby’s life. But as of now, there is no data on the potential impact of COVID-19 during this critical stage of development.

But soon, that will all change. And what will it mean for fertility clinics once there is scientific data?

On this special live episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin spoke with Dr. Eleni Jaswa and Dr. Marcelle Cedars, two of the Principal Investigators of the ASPIRE study being conducted through UCSF Center for Reproductive Health. This study hopes to reach 10,000 pregnant women in their first trimester and monitor them, looking for any impact that COVID-19 might have on fetuses through babies aged 18 months. They share the ultimate goal of the study, just how they are going to do it, and what you can do to be involved to help patients make more informed decisions when it comes to the potential risks of COVID-19.

67 - Standard Operating Procedures for Resuming Fertility Practice Operations, An Interview with Jovana Lekovich and Lisa Rinehart

Clinics are slowly opening back up. Patients are returning for services. But things definitely look different than they did two months ago.

On this special live episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talked to Dr. Jovana Lekovich of RMA of New York and Lisa Rinehart of LegalCare Consulting. Together, we discussed the new normal of clinics and took a look at how clinics can update their Standard Operating Procedures to comply with federal guidelines, all while keeping their patients and employees safe.

64 - Consents in the Age of COVID-19: Using Digital Solutions to Protect Your Patients and You

“...this is an unprecedented time for everybody. We all have our expertise in different areas and our experience in different areas and now's the time to be talking about our approaches, what we're doing, sharing our ideas, and really, really working together to try to get through this and to put practices and patients in the best positions possible.”

It is business as unusual right now. Patients everywhere have been told that treatments have been put on hold and have been left in limbo. Thankfully, there has been a surge in interest in using digital technology to keep some semblance of normal for patients seeking treatment. Thanks to applications such as Zoom, clinics are able to conduct consults or relay testing results. And thanks to new innovations making consents available online, clinics are able to get patients ready for treatment, while remaining in good legal-standing.

On this special episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Jeff Issner and Taylor Stein of EngagedMD, a company that has developed an application that not only provides digital consent forms, but also goes the extra mile in patient education. Dr. Steven Katz of REI Protect joins in the discussion, offering his perspective on risk mitigation and ensuring your practice reduces liability in any way it can during these unprecedented times.

This episode was recorded during a live webinar. In the coming weeks, we will continue to provide webinars with updated information on relevant topics. Learn more about our upcoming webinars at FertilityBridge.com.

Please note that all information included in this podcast is not legal advice and is simply to provide fertility clinics with information on the use of digital consents. Before using any advice in this podcast episode, please consult with your legal team.

Find Jeff Issner and Tayor Stein at Engaged MD by visiting Engaged-MD.com.Learn about Dr. Katz and his services at REI Protect at REIProtect.com.

Need help navigating marketing through this unprecedented time? Check out our COVID-19 Toolkit from Fertility Bridge.

63 - Is it Time to Reduce Your Staff? Managing Furloughs, Layoffs, and Financial Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Determining when, how, and why you should consider staff reductions can be challenging. During the COVID-19 pandemic, making these decisions can be even harder.

On this special episode of Inside Reproductive Health, I spoke with Sara Mooney, Director of Administration at Seattle Reproductive Medicine and Marianne Kreiner, Chief Human Resources Officer at Shady Grove Fertility. Together, we lay out some details of the CARES Act, the Paycheck Protection Program, and answer questions from fertility leaders in clinics across the country.

We are all in this together. If you need help navigating your business through this pandemic and want to know how to prepare your clinic when it is over, sign up for our Communications and Marketing Toolkit.

To get started on a marketing plan for your company, complete the Goal and Competitive Diagnostic at FertilityBridge.com.

62 - Navigating Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic, an Interview with Jill Gordon and Sarah Swank

The outbreak of COVID-19 is changing the world, in both the present and in the future. In these uncertain times, hospitals and other healthcare facilities are looking to implement new technologies to continue to provide services, while limiting their face-to-face interaction. But implementing HIPAA-approved telehealth applications in a short amount of time can prove to be a challenge. Thankfully, the federal government is lifting rules and reevaluating their regulations to allow healthcare companies to use other tools to reach their patients in these difficult times. On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Jill Gordon and Sarah Swank, lawyers in the healthcare division of Nixon Peabody. They navigate the changes to HIPAA regulations in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis and how clinics can appropriately implement telehealth to help their patients through their journeys without seeing them in office.

55 - Easing the Strain of Embryo Disposition on Patients and Clinics, An Interview with Andy Gairani

Embryo disposition is a sensitive topic for patients even long after they’ve left a clinic. However, there can also be a burden placed on clinics when it comes to making space and cryopreserving embryo, eggs, or sperm for an extended period of time. On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, we learn more about how one company is working to alleviate the burden for both the patient and the clinic. Listen to Griffin talk to Andrew Gairani of Embryo Options, a web-based application that provides patients with disposition education and resources, along with other features that make storage easier for everyone.

48 - David Wolf, Do Regulatory Restrictions Hinder or Help Innovation in the Fertility Field?

“...I think fighting consolidation is not going to be a winning strategy in the long run. That being said, I think there's still lots of room for creative, innovative, entrepreneurial operators whether they’re at the clinic level or the supplier level and... as the field gets bigger and gets more interesting from a public capital markets perspective, there's going to be a lot more opportunity for funding those exciting innovations.”

Consolidation, IPO, publicly-owned...all words that weren’t a part of the fertility world vocabulary 10 years ago. Now, they are becoming more and more common, which can be both exciting and nerve-wracking to entrepreneurs in the field. On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin Jones, founder of Fertility Bridge, talks to David Wolf, President and CEO of Hamilton Thorne. They discuss the implications of consolidation coming into the fertility world as well as the pros and cons of both publicly- and privately-owned clinics and suppliers.

Click here to learn more about David Wolf and Hamilton Thorne.

To get started on a marketing plan for your company, complete the Goal and Competitive Diagnostic at FertilityBridge.com.

47 - Geographical Differences in 3rd Party Reproduction, An Interview with Liz Ellwood

With the introduction of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act in Canada, Canadian clinics and families have been struggling to find quality third-party reproduction partners while remaining in accordance with the law. After going through her own journey and learning the challenges of the process, Liz Ellwood decided to make a difference in the lives of hundreds of Canadian families struggling with infertility by co-founding Fertility Match, an agency that matches families with donors. On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Liz about her story and what she is doing to make the third-party reproductive process easier on families in Canada.

To learn more about Liz Ellwood, Fertile Future, and how you can help, visit www.fertilefuture.ca.

Want to learn more about Fertility Match? Visit them at www.fertilitymatch.ca.

The details of the Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act can be found at https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/act/a-13.4/

To get started on a marketing plan for your company, complete the Goal and Competitive Diagnostic at FertilityBridge.com.

42 - Insights from a Futurist: Genetic Engineering, An Interview with Jamie Metzl

Preimplantation genetic testing has opened up a world of helping families have successful pregnancies. But when does the testing and selection of embryos go too far? In this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Dr. Jamie Metzl, author of Hacking Darwin: Genetic Engineering and the Future of Humanity. They discuss the implications of advanced technologies such as the future of embryo screening and gene-editing. More importantly, Dr. Metzl discusses the significance of understanding the coming technologies and how those in the fertility field can help prepare their patients and the rest of the world for these changes.

40 - Inside the Minds of Two Fertility Marketers, An Interview with Rob Taylor

There are lots of variables that make marketing to your patients a challenge. From age to regional differences, it isn’t an easy task and getting someone who understands both the world of marketing and the world of fertility can be beneficial. On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin talks to Rob Taylor, owner of TD Media, another marketing firm helping fertility centers get results. They talk about trends they see in the world of fertility marketing, as well as some strategies that clinics, and physicians, can implement to increase their online presence, in turn, helping them reach their marketing goals.

39 - Can Geographic Location Have An Impact on Fertility Success? An Interview with Dr. Alex Quaas

But think of the differences across the world--it’s hard to fathom! On this episode of Inside Reproductive Health, Griffin Jones and Dr. Alex Quaas give us a glimpse into (literally) the world of fertility. Having practiced in numerous states and countries, Dr. Quaas shares his experiences, diving into the biggest differences in care he witnessed in Europe and here in the USA.

37 - Confessions of an IVF Marketer, An Interview with Griffin Jones

We’ve flipped the script on this episode of Inside Reproductive Health and interviewed our esteemed host, Griffin Jones! Stephanie Linder interviews Griffin, founder of Fertility Bridge, and learns the mission of Fertility Bridge and why he chose to help the field of fertility. Griffin also shares his thoughts on who is doing well and what clinics could be doing to reach more patients and make their mark on the field as a whole.